hide Sorting

You can sort these results in two ways:

By entity (current method)
Chronological order for dates, alphabetical order for places and people.
By position
As the entities appear in the document.

You are currently sorting in ascending order. Sort in descending order.

hide Most Frequent Entities

The entities that appear most frequently in this document are shown below.

Entity Max. Freq Min. Freq
French Forrest 25 1 Browse Search
United States (United States) 20 0 Browse Search
C. L. Vallandigham 18 0 Browse Search
Thomas J. Jackson 14 2 Browse Search
Privates Adams 12 0 Browse Search
Hooker 11 3 Browse Search
George B. McClellan 10 0 Browse Search
Barksdale 9 1 Browse Search
France (France) 8 0 Browse Search
Richmond (Virginia, United States) 7 1 Browse Search
View all entities in this document...

Browsing named entities in a specific section of The Daily Dispatch: May 13, 1863., [Electronic resource]. Search the whole document.

Found 47 total hits in 23 results.

1 2 3
Layard (search for this): article 13
the character of the subject, to continue the debate on the present occasion. He must express his regret for the language of the honorable member from Sheffield. Mr. Peacock said it was very inconvenient to discuss a question of such importance without having more authentic information than a newspaper correspondence. He therefore moved an amendment for the production of all the official correspondence relating to the matter. Mr. Newdegate denounced Mr. Roebuck's language. Mr. Layard deprecated a continuance of the discussion, and hoped that the House had confidence enough in the Government to leave the matter in their hands. With regard to the conveyance of the mails the question had not been fairly represented to the merchants, who had requested that a mail agent should be placed on board vessels carrying mails to Mexico, or that they should be relieved of the obligation of carrying them lest they should be likely to be seized from having hostile correspondence in t
Malins (search for this): article 13
ation of carrying them lest they should be likely to be seized from having hostile correspondence in the mails, and in compliance the Government had relieved them of the obligation. Sir H. Cairns asked if it was to be understood that vessels carrying mails to a neutral port were regarded as liable to seizure on account of the correspondence in the mails? If that principle was to be laid down the mail packet between Dever and Calais was liable to be seized by an American cruiser. Mr. Malins, in common with all English men, was humiliated at the unaccountable timidity of Government in not making the rights of English merchants respecting, and in protecting English vessels in, their legitimate trade. The mail question. In the House of Lords, on the 24th, Lord Ridesdale referred to Mr. Seward's instructions to the naval officers of the United States cruisers, directing that the mails should not be opened when seized on board any ship, but should be either given up to t
Newdegate (search for this): article 13
would be most improper and dangerous, considering the character of the subject, to continue the debate on the present occasion. He must express his regret for the language of the honorable member from Sheffield. Mr. Peacock said it was very inconvenient to discuss a question of such importance without having more authentic information than a newspaper correspondence. He therefore moved an amendment for the production of all the official correspondence relating to the matter. Mr. Newdegate denounced Mr. Roebuck's language. Mr. Layard deprecated a continuance of the discussion, and hoped that the House had confidence enough in the Government to leave the matter in their hands. With regard to the conveyance of the mails the question had not been fairly represented to the merchants, who had requested that a mail agent should be placed on board vessels carrying mails to Mexico, or that they should be relieved of the obligation of carrying them lest they should be likely
Peacock (search for this): article 13
not to be passed over tacitly, but called for a strong expression of opinion from Government. Mr. R. Crawford said that at the proper time lie he was prepared to go into the case of the Peterhoff; but after the speech of the noble Lord at the head of the Government, it would be most improper and dangerous, considering the character of the subject, to continue the debate on the present occasion. He must express his regret for the language of the honorable member from Sheffield. Mr. Peacock said it was very inconvenient to discuss a question of such importance without having more authentic information than a newspaper correspondence. He therefore moved an amendment for the production of all the official correspondence relating to the matter. Mr. Newdegate denounced Mr. Roebuck's language. Mr. Layard deprecated a continuance of the discussion, and hoped that the House had confidence enough in the Government to leave the matter in their hands. With regard to the co
Roeback (search for this): article 13
The late debate in the British Parliament. a charge on the Yankee race by Mr. Roeback--they are Uncivilized, and unfit to Receive International Court sales. In the House of Commons, on the — thault., Mr. Roebuck said he wished to ask a question of great importance. [Hear, hear] He alluded to the proceedings of an Admiral in the United States service, with respect to an English merchant ship going from an English port to a neutral port. [Hear, hear,] He wished to preface his question with one or two observations. Mr. Knightly rose, amid some confusion, to put it to the speaker, whether the honorable and learned member was not infringing the rules of the House. [Cries of "good" addressed to Mr. Roebuck, followed this interruption.] Lord Palmerston interposed. He said, "May I be just allowed to answer my honorable and learned friend's question?" [Loud laughter.] Speech of Mr. Roebuck. I know the noble Lord is an older man than I am; but still, ol
Roebuck (search for this): article 13
are Uncivilized, and unfit to Receive International Court sales. In the House of Commons, on the — thault., Mr. Roebuck said he wished to ask a question of great importance. [Hear, hear] He alluded to the proceedings of an Admiral in theer, whether the honorable and learned member was not infringing the rules of the House. [Cries of "good" addressed to Mr. Roebuck, followed this interruption.] Lord Palmerston interposed. He said, "May I be just allowed to answer my honorable and learned friend's question?" [Loud laughter.] Speech of Mr. Roebuck. I know the noble Lord is an older man than I am; but still, older as he is, he will not take me in that way. [A laugh.] I wish to make a few observations before I put tn amendment for the production of all the official correspondence relating to the matter. Mr. Newdegate denounced Mr. Roebuck's language. Mr. Layard deprecated a continuance of the discussion, and hoped that the House had confidence enough
Seward (search for this): article 13
countable timidity of Government in not making the rights of English merchants respecting, and in protecting English vessels in, their legitimate trade. The mail question. In the House of Lords, on the 24th, Lord Ridesdale referred to Mr. Seward's instructions to the naval officers of the United States cruisers, directing that the mails should not be opened when seized on board any ship, but should be either given up to the Consul of the nation to which the vessel belonged or sent to tish vessels had been seized, as stated in the evening papers. Earl Russell said that Government had received information that vessels had been seized in the act of breaking the blockade. He wished to explain that, in answer to Lord Lyons, Mr. Seward had written a letter to Mr. Wells modifying the instructions issued by the latter to the officers of the Federal navy, and it was to this letter he referred. He would, however, consult the law officers of the crown. The Earl of Hardwick sa
France (France) (search for this): article 13
h merchant in his honorable trade have been utterly destroyed by the conduct of the American Government. I say that conduct of the American Government you ought to resent. [Cheers.] But not only was this done.--There were persons calling themselves English merchants, who applied to the American Minister for a permit to allow their ships to proceed in safety to its destination. That permit is granted, and why? Because that ship carried out arms to the Mexicans to be used against our ally, France. --[Cheers.] Since then, other men calling themselves English merchants have applied to the same authority for the same permit. They have been refused because they are Englishmen, and because they are not carrying out arms to aid the Mexicans in the war, though they were trading to the same port. [Cheers.] The permit, I repeat, was refused, and now I must say that Mr. Adams, the American Minister, is the Minister for commerce in England. [Loud cheers.] Sir, I would put it to the noble Lor
Mexico (Mexico, Mexico) (search for this): article 13
at present to state at what result. Her Majesty's Government might arrive. Mr. G. P. Bentinck, at some length, called attention to the correspondence in the Times with respect to the seizure of the Peterhoff, the conveyance of the mails to Mexico, and the conduct of the American Minister in granting permits for the conveyance of arms for the use of the Mexicans against the French. This conduct ought not to be passed over tacitly, but called for a strong expression of opinion from Governm the Government to leave the matter in their hands. With regard to the conveyance of the mails the question had not been fairly represented to the merchants, who had requested that a mail agent should be placed on board vessels carrying mails to Mexico, or that they should be relieved of the obligation of carrying them lest they should be likely to be seized from having hostile correspondence in the mails, and in compliance the Government had relieved them of the obligation. Sir H. Cairns
Sheffield (United Kingdom) (search for this): article 13
his conduct ought not to be passed over tacitly, but called for a strong expression of opinion from Government. Mr. R. Crawford said that at the proper time lie he was prepared to go into the case of the Peterhoff; but after the speech of the noble Lord at the head of the Government, it would be most improper and dangerous, considering the character of the subject, to continue the debate on the present occasion. He must express his regret for the language of the honorable member from Sheffield. Mr. Peacock said it was very inconvenient to discuss a question of such importance without having more authentic information than a newspaper correspondence. He therefore moved an amendment for the production of all the official correspondence relating to the matter. Mr. Newdegate denounced Mr. Roebuck's language. Mr. Layard deprecated a continuance of the discussion, and hoped that the House had confidence enough in the Government to leave the matter in their hands. With
1 2 3