previous next

Habeas corpus,

In English history. the subjects' writ of right, passed “for the better securing the liberty of the subject,” 31 Charles II., c. 2, May 27, 1679. If any person be imprisoned by the order of any court, or of the King, he may have a writ of habeas corpus to bring him before the King's bench or common pleas, which shall determine whether his committal be just. This act (founded on the old common-law) is next in importance to magna charta. Parliament may suspend the habeas corpus act for a specified time in great emergency. Then the nation parts with a portion of liberty to secure its permanent welfare, and suspected persons may then be arrested without cause assigned.-Blackstone.

Act suspended for a short time.1689, 1696, 1708
Suspended for Scots' Rebellion1715-16
Suspended for twelve months1722
Suspended for Scots' Rebellion1744-45
Suspended for American War1777-79
Again by Mr. Pitt, owing to French Revolution1794
Suspended in Ireland in the great rebellion1798
Suspended in EnglandAug. 28, 1799, and April 14, 1801
Again, on account of Irish insurrection1803
Again, on alleged secret meetingsFeb. 21, 1817
Bill to restore habeas corpus introduced Jan. 28, 1818
Suspended in Ireland (insurrection)July 24, 1848
Restored thereMarch 1, 1849
Suspended again Feb. 17, 1866; Feb. 26, and May 31, 1867; and Feb. 28, 1868, till1 March 25, 1869

In United States history the Constitution provides that “the privilege of habeas corpus shall not be suspended, unless when, in cases of rebellion or invasion, the public safety may require it” ; but does not specify what department of the government may suspend it. A series of contests on this subject began with the Civil War and continued throughout, both as to the legality of suspension and the jurisdiction. The writ of habeas corpus was first suspended by President Lincoln between Washington and Philadelphia, April 27, 1861, in instructions to General Scott (it had been suspended by State authority [192] in Rhode Island for a brief time during Dorr's rebellion). See Dorr, Thomas Wilson.

President suspends the writ in Key West, Tortugas, and Santa Rosa
May 10, 1861
Further extensionJuly 2, 1861
Chief-Justice Taney issues a writ of Habeas corpus May 27, to Gen. Geo.
Cadwallader on appeal by John Merryman, of Baltimore, then confined in Fort McHenry2May 25, 1861
Theophilus Parsons supports President's power to suspendJune 5, 1861
Attorney-General Bates asserts the President's power to declare martial law and suspend the writ of habeas corpusJuly 5, 1861
One hundred and seventy-four persons committed to Fort Lafayette,July to Oct., 1861
Suspension of the writ made generalSept. 24, 1862
Congress by act upholds this powerMarch 3, 1863
Vallandigham arrestedMay 4 1863
President suspends by proclamationSept. 15, 1863
All persons held under suspension of the writ dischargedMay, 1864
Suspends in KentuckyJuly 5, 1864
President Johnson restores the writ of habeas corpus except in the late insurrectionary States, District of Columbia, New Mexico, and Arizona, by proclamationDec. 11, 1865
In all States and Territories except TexasApril 2, 1866
Throughout the United StatesAug. 20, 1866
Thirty-eight thousand arrests were made according to the provost-marshal's record, Washington, during the Civil War.

1 Because of the affair of John Anderson, an act of 1862 enacted that no writ of habeas corpus should issue out of England to any colony, etc., having a court with authority to grant such writ.

2 [On the general's refusal to obey the writ Taney attempts to arrest him, but fails.]

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 United States License.

An XML version of this text is available for download, with the additional restriction that you offer Perseus any modifications you make. Perseus provides credit for all accepted changes, storing new additions in a versioning system.

hide People (automatically extracted)
hide Display Preferences
Greek Display:
Arabic Display:
View by Default:
Browse Bar: