This text is part of:
[182]
third chapter he examines more particularly the external evidence of revelation, ‘shewing that we have a sufficient probability, even at this distance, of the authenticness, credibility, and purity of the books of the New Testament; and that the common people are able to judge of the truth and uncorruptedness of a traditional religion; with an answer to the arguments drawn from the change of languages, the different use of words, the style and phrase of scripture, &c., to prove it to be an obscure, perplexed, and uncertain rule.’
The work concludes with a vindication of positive institutions; particularly of the few and simple positive ordinances of the Gospel.
In various parts of the work we have an able exposure of the manner in which sceptical writers are apt to confound the corruptions of Christianity with Christianity itself,—an artifice for which the unhappy differences among Christians, and the multitudes of unauthorized additions, commandments of men, often foreign to the spirit and inconsistent with the tendency and design of the Gospel, have at all times afforded but too much scope.
On the whole, this treatise is written with great clearness of thought and expression, and reflects much credit on the abilities and ingenuity of the author.
It met with such general approbation from the judicious and candid of all parties, that repeated impressions were soon demanded by the public.
Even Dr. Tindal, against whose work it was written, is said always to have spoken of of it with great respect.
In one particular it certainly well deserves to be held up as a model for controversial treatises; that its attack is
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 United States License.
An XML version of this text is available for download, with the additional restriction that you offer Perseus any modifications you make. Perseus provides credit for all accepted changes, storing new additions in a versioning system.