12.
This man, O Publius Lentulus, was present at all your counsels, while you
were thinking of nothing day and night except my safety. He cooperated with
you as a most influential adviser in planning the conduct to be pursued, as
a most faithful ally in preparing for it, and as a most fearless assistant
in executing it. It was he who visited all the municipalities and colonies;
it was he who implored the assistance of all Italy, which was eager to afford it; it was he who in the
senate was the first person to deliver his opinion, and when he had
delivered it there, he then also entreated the Roman people to preserve me.
[31]
Wherefore, you may desist from that
language which you have been using, namely, that the dispositions of the
priests were changed after my delivering the opinion which I did about the
corn. As if they had any different opinion from what I myself had about
Cnaeus Pompeius, or as if they were ignorant what I ought to do either with
regard to the expectation of the Roman people, or to the services which I
have received from Cnaeus Pompeius, or to my own circumstances and
condition; or as if even, if my sentiments had perchance been offensive to
any one of the priests, though I know for a certainty that the contrary was
the case, any priest was on that account going to decide about religion, or
any citizen about the republic, in any other manner than the laws respecting
religious ceremonies compelled the one, or the interests and safety of the
republic compelled the other.
[32]
I am aware, O priests, that I have said
more things which are foreign to this cause, than either your opinion is
likely to approve of, or than my own inclination prompted. But I was anxious
to be acquitted in your eyes; and, further, your kindness in listening to me
with attention carried me on to say more than I had intended. But I will
make amends for this by the brevity of that part of the speech which relates
to the actual matter now brought under your examination; and as the affair
is divided into two heads,—one relating to the laws of religion,
and the other to the laws of the state, —I will pass over the
question of religion, which would take a longer time to discuss, and speak
to the point of what is the law of the state.
[33]
For what can be so arrogant as for a layman to
endeavour to lecture the college of priests about religion, about divine
affairs, and ceremonies, and sacrifices; or so foolish as for a man, if he
has found anything of consequence in your books, to take up time in
detailing it to you; or so superfluous, as to seek to acquire learning on
those points concerning which our ancestors have laid down the principle
that you alone have knowledge, and that you alone ought to be consulted?
This text is part of:
Search the Perseus Catalog for:
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 United States License.
An XML version of this text is available for download, with the additional restriction that you offer Perseus any modifications you make. Perseus provides credit for all accepted changes, storing new additions in a versioning system.