2.
And in the first place, I ask you this, O you insane and frantic man, what
excessive punishment for your wickednesses and crimes is it that distracts
you so as to make you think that these men—men of their high
character, who support the dignity of the republic, not only by their
wisdom, but also by their dignified appearance—are angry with me,
because in delivering my opinion I connected the safety of the citizens with
the honour of Cnaeus Pompeius, and that they are likely at this present time
to have different feelings with respect to the general interests of religion
from those which they entertained when I was absent?
[4]
“Oh,” says he, “you had
the advantage before the priests, but now you must inevitably get worst off
since you have had recourse to the people.” Is it so? Will you
transfer that which is the greatest defect in the ignorant
multitude,—namely, its fickleness and inconstancy, and change of
opinion, as frequent as the changes of the weather, to these men, whose
gravity protects them from inconsistency, while their fixed and definite
principles of religion and the antiquity of precedents, and the authority of
written records and monuments, effectually deters them from all capricious
change of sentiment? “Are you,” says he, “the
man whom the senate was unable to do without? whom the good lamented? whom
the republic regretted? by whose restoration we expected that the authority
of the senate was restored? and who destroyed that authority the very first
thing you did?” I am not at present speaking of my own matters; I
will first of all reply to your impudence.
This text is part of:
Search the Perseus Catalog for:
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 United States License.
An XML version of this text is available for download, with the additional restriction that you offer Perseus any modifications you make. Perseus provides credit for all accepted changes, storing new additions in a versioning system.