I suppose, men of Athens, you would all say
you wish to have put into effect what each one considers best for the city. Quite so, but
it happens that the same plan has not been judged the best by all of you; otherwise some
of you would not be bidding the speaker “Go on” and others
“Sit down.” Now, to those who hold the same measures to be expedient
as does the one who is about to speak there is no need of a single word, for they are
already convinced; but to those who think that the opposite course is for the best, I wish
to speak briefly.
[2]
Unless you will listen, it is, of
course, absolutely impossible to learn anything,1 any more than if
you keep quiet when no one is speaking. But if you do listen it is impossible to miss one
or the other of two benefits for either, being all persuaded and of the same mind, you
will be more unanimous in your decision—and nothing better than this could
happen for the present emergency—or else, if the speaker be unable to make his
point, you will have more confidence in the decisions already reached.
[3]
Apart from these two possibilities, there is a suspicion, and by no
means to your credit, that, although you have come to the assembly under obligation to
choose the best plan on the basis of what shall be said, instead, you will be found,
before reaching a judgement on the basis of the speeches, to have been convinced of
something in your own minds, and this so strongly that you are not even willing to hear
anything to the contrary.
1 This commonplace appears also in Dem. Ex. 3, Dem. Ex. 4 and Dem. Ex. 5.