[
1248a]
[1]
The fact is that the good fortune here and that in the
other case are the same. Or is good fortune of more than one kind, and
is fortune twofold? But
since we see some people being fortunate contrary to all the teachings
of science and correct calculation, it is clear that the cause of good
fortune must be something different. But is it or is it not good
fortune whereby a man formed a desire for the right thing and at the
right time when in his case human reasoning could not make this
calculation? For a thing the desire for which is natural is not
altogether uncalculated, but the reasoning is perverted by something.
So no doubt he
seems fortunate, because fortune is the cause of things contrary to
reason, and this is contrary to reason, for it is contrary to
knowledge and to general principle. But probably it does not really come from fortune,
but seems to do so from the above cause. So that this argument does
not prove that good fortune comes by nature, but that not all those
who seem fortunate succeed because of fortune, but because of nature;
nor does it prove that there is no such thing as fortune, nor that
fortune is not the cause of anything, but that it is not the cause of
all the things of which it seems to be the cause.
Yet someone may raise the question whether fortune is the cause of
precisely this—forming a desire for the right thing at the
right time. Or, on that showing, will not fortune be the cause of
everything—even of thought and deliberation? since it is not
the case, that one only deliberates when one has deliberated even
previously to that deliberation,
[20]
nor does one only think when one has previously thought
before thinking, and so on to infinity, but there is some
starting-point; therefore thought is not the starting-point of
thinking, nor deliberation of deliberating. Then what else is, save
fortune? It will follow that everything originates from fortune. Or
shall we say that there is a certain starting-point outside which
there is no other, and that this, merely owing to its being of such
and such a nature, can produce a result of such and such a nature?
But this is what
we are investigating—what is the starting-point of motion in
the spirit? The answer then is clear: as in the universe, so there,
everything is moved by God; for in a manner the divine element in us
is the cause of all our motions. And the starting-point of reason is not reason but
something superior to reason. What, then, could be superior even to
knowledge and to intellect, except God? Not goodness, for goodness is
an instrument of the mind; and owing to this, as I was saying some
time ago,
1 those are called
fortunate who although irrational succeed in whatever they start on.
And it does not pay them to deliberate, for they have within them a
principle of a kind that is better than mind and deliberation
(whereas the
others have reason but have not this): they have inspiration, but they
cannot deliberate. For although irrational they attain even what
belongs to the prudent and wise—swiftness of divination:
only the divination that is based on reason we must not specify, but
some of them attain it by experience and others by practice in the use
of observation; and these men use the divine.
2 For this quality discerns aright the future as
well as the present, and these are the men whose reason is
disengaged.
3 This is why the melancholic even have dreams
that are true; for it seems that when the reason is disengaged
principle has more strength—