[97]
Oh, but Bulbus also
was condemned. Add that he was condemned of treason, in order that you may understand that
this trial has no connection with that one. But this charge was brought against him. I confess
it; but it was also made evident by the letters of Caius Cosconius and by the evidence of many
witnesses, that a legion in Illyricum had been
tampered with by him; and that charge was one peculiarly belonging to that sort of
investigation, and was one which was comprehended under the law of treason. But this was an
exceedingly great disadvantage to him. That is mere guess work; and if we may have recourse to
that, take care, I beg you, that my conjecture be not far the more accurate of the two. For my
opinion is, that Bulbus, because he was a worthless, base, dishonest man, and because he came
before the court contaminated with many crimes of the deepest dye, was on that account the
more easily condemned. But you, out of Bulbus's whole case, select that which seems to suit
your own purpose, in order that you may say that it was that which influenced the judges.
This text is part of:
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 United States License.
An XML version of this text is available for download, with the additional restriction that you offer Perseus any modifications you make. Perseus provides credit for all accepted changes, storing new additions in a versioning system.