7.
[16]
When a most powerful and noble tribune of the people, Marcus Drusus, proposed
one formula of inquiry affecting the equestrian
order,—“If any one had taken money on account of a
judicial decision,”—the Roman knights openly resisted
it. Why? Did they wish to be allowed to act in such a manner? Far from it.
They thought this cause of receiving money not only shameful, but actually
impious. But they argued in this way: that those men only ought to be made
liable to the operation of any law, who of their own judgment submitted to
such conditions of life. “The highest rank,” say they,
“in the state is a great pleasure; and the curule chair, and the
fasces, and supreme command, and a province, and priesthoods, and triumphs, and even the fact of
having an image to keep alive the recollection of one with posterity.
[17]
There is also some anxiety mingled
with this pleasure, and a greater apprehension of laws and of trials. We
have never despised those considerations;” (for so they argued;)
“but we have adopted this tranquil and easy kind of life, which,
because it does not bring honours with it is also free from
annoyance.” “You are just as much a judge as I am a
senator.” “Just so, but you sought for the one honour,
and I am compelled to accept of the other; wherefore, it ought to be lawful
for me either to decline being a judge, or else I ought not to be subject to
any new law which ought properly to regulate only the conduct of
senators.”
[18]
Will you, O Roman
knights, abandon this privilege which you have received from your fathers? I
warn you not to do so. Men will be hurried before these courts of justice,
not only whenever they fall into all deserved unpopularity, but whenever
spiteful people say a word against them, if you do not take care to prevent
it. If it were now told you that opinions were pronounced in the senate that
you should be liable to be proceeded against under these laws, you would
think it necessary to run in crowds to the senate-house. If the law was
passed, you would throng to the rostra. The
senate has decided that you are exempt from the operation of this law; the
people has never subjected you to it; you have met together here free from
it; take care that you do not depart entangled in its toils.
[19]
For if it was imputed as a crime to Postumus, who was neither a tribune, nor
a prefect, nor one of his companions from Italy, nor even a friend of
Gabinius's, how will these men hereafter defend themselves, who, being of
your order, have been implicated with our magistrates in these causes?
This text is part of:
Search the Perseus Catalog for:
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 United States License.
An XML version of this text is available for download, with the additional restriction that you offer Perseus any modifications you make. Perseus provides credit for all accepted changes, storing new additions in a versioning system.