previous next


For again let the rectangle BD, G be equal to the square on A.

Since then the rectangle BC, EF is equal to the rectangle BD, G, therefore, as CB is to BD, so is G to EF. [VI. 16]

But CB is greater than BD; therefore G is also greater than EF. [V. 16, V. 14]

Let EH be equal to G; therefore, as CB is to BD, so is HE to EF; therefore, separando, as CD is to BD, so is HF to FE. [V. 17]

Let it be contrived that, as HF is to FE, so is FK to KE; therefore also the whole HK is to the whole KF as FK is to KE; for, as one of the antecedents is to one of the consequents, so are all the antecedents to all the consequents. [V. 12]

But, as FK is to KE, so is CD to DB; [V. 11] therefore also, as HK is to KF, so is CD to DB. [id.]

But the square on CD is commensurable with the square on DB; [X. 36] therefore the square on HK is also commensurable with the square on KF. [VI. 22, X. 11]

And, as the square on HK is to the square on KF, so is HK to KE, since the three straight lines HK, KF, KE are proportional. [V. Def. 9]

Therefore HK is commensurable in length with KE, so that HE is also commensurable in length with EK. [X. 15]

Now, since the square on A is equal to the rectangle EH, BD, while the square on A is rational, therefore the rectangle EH, BD is also rational.

And it is applied to the rational straight line BD; therefore EH is rational and commensurable in length with BD; [X. 20] so that EK, being commensurable with it, is also rational and commensurable in length with BD.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 United States License.

An XML version of this text is available for download, with the additional restriction that you offer Perseus any modifications you make. Perseus provides credit for all accepted changes, storing new additions in a versioning system.

hide Display Preferences
Greek Display:
Arabic Display:
View by Default:
Browse Bar: