previous next

ASTRATEIAS GRAPHE´

ASTRATEIAS GRAPHE´ (ἀστρατείας γραφή). Under this head we may conveniently group the principal military offences, which at Athens were dealt with by one law. A citizen was liable to indictment, and, if convicted, to disfranchisement for--1. Failure to join the army--ἀστρατείας: 2. Cowardice in battle--δειλίας: 3. Desertion of his post--λιποταξίου: 4. Desertion from the army--λιποστρατίου. Of these terms, λιποταξίου was that used in the widest sense, and might include any of the others. Prof. Jebb observes that it does not appear quite certain whether there was a γραφὴ δειλίας distinct from a γραφὴ λιποταξίου. In Lysias (c. Alcib. 1.6) they appear to be identified; but in the following passages (among others) they are distinguished:--Andoc. de Myst. § 73; Aeschin. in Ctes., § 175; Plato, Legg. 12.943 D, ῥιφθέντων in the last passage being obviously equivalent to δειλίας (Jebb, Att. Or. 1.256 n.). The two speeches of Lysias against the younger Alcibiades--one λιποταξίου, the other ἀστρατείας--are two separate indictments for the same offence, that of serving in the cavalry when he was drawn as a hoplite; an incident highly characteristic of Athenian procedure.

All these actions belonged to the jurisdiction of the strategi: the accuser was any qualified citizen that chose to come forward ( βουλόμενος, οἷς ἔξεστι), and the court was composed of soldiers who had served in the campaign. It has been objected that a soldier could not also be a dicast: but the trial would naturally come on after the campaign was over, and the language of Lysias is explicit (τοὺς στρατιώτας δικάζειν, c. Alcib. 1.6; οὐκ ἐπεξῆλθε μεθ̓ ὑμῶν, § 7; cf. § 15, and the concluding words of the Second Speech). The taxiarchs and hipparchs, having the duty of drawing up the military list, would be associated with the strategi in getting up the case (Demosth. c. Boeot. de Nom. p. 999.17).

The punishment of ἀτιμία is regularly attached to this class of offences (see, besides the passages already referred to, Aeschin. Timarch. § 29; Demosth. Mid. p. 533.58, Ncaer. p. 1353.27), with, of course, further penalties for usurping the forfeited rights (Demosth. c. Timocr. p. 732.103). The question whether confiscation was not added in some cases, has been noticed under ANAUMACHIOU GRAPHÉ. The λιποστρατίου γραφὴ must be distinguished from the much more serious αὐτομολία, or going over to the enemy. The latter was not a purely military offence, and so apparently not tried before the strategi, and was a capital crime [AUTOMOLIAS GRAPHÉ].

[W.W]

hide Display Preferences
Greek Display:
Arabic Display:
View by Default:
Browse Bar: