the London Times warns the United States
to make the blockade effective — England
must have cotton, &c., &c.
New York Nov. 3.
--The City of New York
, at this port yesterday, brings news from Europe
to the 24th ultimo--one day later.
The London Times
published an editorial on the Federal
blockade of the Southern
ports, in which it warns the Lincoln Cabinet
to endeavor to make that measure effective at every point, or else there is danger of its being broken by the English Government
, which has to provide for the wants of many millions of people likely to be thrown out of employment by the cotton mills, in consequence of the cutting off of the supply of that staple.
While the Times
thus expresses the Palmerston ideas on this point of the American
question, we find the London Herald
--the organ of Earl Derby and the aristocrats — after a complete silence of four weeks duration on our affairs, out in a very violent leader on the subject of the condemnation of the bark Hiawatha
and other British vessels, by Judges
of the Union Courts
, for violating the blockade.
pretend that if the decision of Judge Betts
is not either reversed or disavowed, England
will demand reparation for her ship owners and traders, even to the length of a war with the United States
The expressions of the Times
are published merely as party bids for office.
As the day of opening the session of Parliament approaches, the American
question is made a prominent topic in the after-dinner speeches of the English
members of Parliament.
Three Spanish war ships had sailed from Cadiz
for the Gulf of Mexico
has stipulated, in the tripartite treaty, that, if a monarchy should be restored in Mexico
, no member of the Bonaparte or Bourbon
dynasty shall be elevated to the throne.
Another British war vessel (the Medina) has sailed for the West Indies