previous next

Doubling of the Pronouns, to express indefiniteness, appears not merely in quisquis (never in Plural), etc., but also in, e.g., “quantumquantumPoen. 738 (cf. “ubiubiRud. 1210). The same sense is given by the addition of vis, lubet1, cumque (quomque), e.g. Pers. 210quoi pol quomque occasio est” (cf. Bacch. 252ubi fit quaque mentio”); also of -que, e.g. quandoque, quisque (= quisquis), e.g. Mil. 156quemque in tegulis videritis alienum”. (On quisque ‘each,’ and on quisquis with the function of quisque, see below, 25

1 We see the origin of these forms in lines like

But the form quidvis is already crystallized in Mil. 500an, quia latrocinamini, arbitramini quidvis licere facere vobis, verbero?Quovis is not equivalent to quo (tu) vis in Most. 888cibo perduci poteris quovis”.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 United States License.

An XML version of this text is available for download, with the additional restriction that you offer Perseus any modifications you make. Perseus provides credit for all accepted changes, storing new additions in a versioning system.

hide Display Preferences
Greek Display:
Arabic Display:
View by Default:
Browse Bar: