W. M. Lindsay, Syntax of Plautus

---

Latin does not possess a Middle Voice like Greek. The Latin Deponent often corresponds to the Greek Middle, e.g. sequor to ἔπομαι, and Verbs like accingor (e.g. Ter. Phorm. 318; cf. Amph. 308 “cingitur, certe expedit se”), vescor, amicior (e.g. Pers. 307 “subnixis alis me inferam atque amicibor gloriose”) really have the Reflexive function, that as a rule belongs to the Active with the Reflexive Pronoun, e.g. se accingere. Indutus takes an Accusative

• Epid. 223 “quid erat induta? an regillam induculam an mendiculam?”,
• 225 “utin impluvium induta fuerit?”

(II. 49). In Amph. 238 we seem to have a mixture of converti and se convertere: “sed fugam in se tamen nemo convortitur” ‘but still no one turns to flee;’ cf. Stich. 306 “meditabor me ad ludos Olympios”; but the colloquial Latin of Plautus' time (and later) loves to use in this sense the Active Verb without any Reflexive Pronoun, e.g.

recipere for se recipere Pers. 51, Merc. 498, Bacch. 294, Rud. 880 (also se recipere, e.g. Pers. 46, Merc. 881);
capessere (cf. facessere ‘to be off’) Rud. 178 for the usual se capessere (e.g. Rud. 172);
quo (unde) agis? for quo te agis? Pers. 216, Poen. 333, Bacch. 1106 (also quo te agis?, e.g. Trin. 1078);
capite sistere, e.g. Curc. 287, Mil. 850 (II. 64);
male res vortunt Pers. 453;
foris aperit ‘the door opens’ Pers. 300 (cf. Aul. 411).

Apparently habere for se habere is to be similarly explained, e.g. Ter. Phorm. 429 “bene habent tibi principia” (cf. εὖ ἔχει); also praebeo for se praebeo in Ter. Phorm. 476, and the like. Cf. Pomponius 66 “age, anus, accinge ad molas”; perhaps Ter. Eun. 912 “move vero ocius” (but cf. Andr. 731). In a passage of the Cistellaria we have “insinuavit se” (v. 89) followed by insinuavit ( v. 92 “inde in amicitiam insinuavit cum matre”). While lavĕre is the Transitive Verb, lavare is the Reflexive ‘to bathe,’ ‘take a bath,’ e.g. Mil. 251 “dormit, ornatur, lavat”, which however appears as Deponent-Middle in Poen. 229 “ornantur, lavantur, tergentur.”