[143]
In
truth, suppose, for example, that Caius Verres had demanded a hundred and twenty
thousand sesterces from the people of Centuripa, and
had taken this money from them; there would have been no doubt, I conceive, that, if
that were proved, he must have been condemned.—What then? Suppose he
demanded three hundred thousand sesterces of the same
people; and compelled them to give them, and carried them off? Shall he be acquitted
because it was entered in the accounts that that money was given for statues? I
think not; unless, indeed, our object is to create, not an unwillingness to take
money on the part of our magistrates, but a cause for giving it on the part of our
allies. But if statues are a great delight to any one, and if any one is greatly
attracted by the honour and glory of having them raised to him, still he must lay
down these rules; first of all, that he must not take to his own house the money
given for those purposes; secondly, that there must be some limit to those statues;
and lastly, that at all events they must not be exacted from unwilling people.
This text is part of:
Search the Perseus Catalog for:
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 United States License.
An XML version of this text is available for download, with the additional restriction that you offer Perseus any modifications you make. Perseus provides credit for all accepted changes, storing new additions in a versioning system.