previous next
[82] act accordingly if elected. Van Buren, with characteristic two-facedness, admitted the power, but said the objections to its exercise, against the will of the South, were so ‘imperative in their nature and obligations’ as to amount to a want of constitutional power; and gave the same pledge as his rival. He went further1 on this side, anticipating the repression of agitation, and that ‘for some time, at least, we shall have no more foreign agents to enlighten us on the subject,’ as the foreign public will take heed of ‘recent results here.’2

This optimistic view was not shared by his Southern auditors. They knew, in fact, as Senator Preston declared, that ‘in England and in France the 3 developments of popular sentiment are all against us.4 The denunciations heard there reverberate throughout our own country.’ The Liberator, indeed, for 1836 is one long reverberation of Thompson's triumphant tour through5 England and Scotland, rehearsing in assembly rooms and chapels his American experience, setting forth the aims and character of the abolitionists and the relations of parties in the United States, exposing the Texas conspiracy, and fanning to a fresh heat a zeal which already he was preparing to turn against the apprenticeship system in6

1 Lib. 6.65.

2 It was of this manifesto that Mr. Garrison wrote to G. W. Benson, April 10, 1836 (Ms.): ‘Political abolitionists are now placed in an awkward predicament. What an outrageous letter Martin Van Buren has written to certain political rascals in North Carolina, respecting slavery in the District of Columbia! No consistent abolitionist can now vote for him. It seems that our alternative must now be between Webster or Harrison. I should prefer the former. Van Buren, you will observe, covers the Society of Friends with the slime of his panegyric, and draws a broad line of distinction between them and the abolitionists. Why? Simply because the Friends in North Carolina are numerous, and their votes are wanted to turn the scales in favor of the “ Magician.” ’

3 Lib. 6.48.

4 The French Society for the Abolition of Slavery, through its secretary, Count Alexandre de Laborde, apprised Mr. Garrison, by letter of July 23, 1836, of his having been elected a corresponding member. A similar honor had been bestowed by Scotland. ‘A powerful union,’ he says (Lib. 6.159), ‘is now formed between the abolitionists of England, France and America, for the extirpation of slavery and the slave trade from the face of the whole earth.’

5 Annual Report Mass. A. S. Soc., 1837, p. 51.

6 Lib. 6.86.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 United States License.

An XML version of this text is available for download, with the additional restriction that you offer Perseus any modifications you make. Perseus provides credit for all accepted changes, storing new additions in a versioning system.

hide Places (automatically extracted)

View a map of the most frequently mentioned places in this document.

Sort places alphabetically, as they appear on the page, by frequency
Click on a place to search for it in this document.
United States (United States) (2)
Scotland (United Kingdom) (2)
North Carolina (North Carolina, United States) (2)
France (France) (2)

Download Pleiades ancient places geospacial dataset for this text.

hide People (automatically extracted)
Sort people alphabetically, as they appear on the page, by frequency
Click on a person to search for him/her in this document.
Lib (4)
W. L. Garrison (2)
Webster (1)
George Thompson (1)
A. S. Soc (1)
Jonas Preston (1)
Alexandre Laborde (1)
William Henry Harrison (1)
Martin Buren (1)
George W. Benson (1)
hide Dates (automatically extracted)
Sort dates alphabetically, as they appear on the page, by frequency
Click on a date to search for it in this document.
1837 AD (1)
July 23rd, 1836 AD (1)
April 10th, 1836 AD (1)
1836 AD (1)
hide Display Preferences
Greek Display:
Arabic Display:
View by Default:
Browse Bar: