I am not discouraged by the fact that this great truth3 [‘the unutterable worth of every human being’] has been espoused most earnestly by a party which numbers in its ranks few great names. . . . The less prosperous classes furnish the world with its reformers and martyrs. These, however, from imperfect culture, are apt to narrow themselves to one idea,4 to fasten their eyes on a single evil, to lose the balance of their minds, to kindle with a feverish enthusiasm. Let such remember that no man should take on himself the office of a reformer whose zeal in a particular cause is not tempered by extensive sympathies and universal love.5
This text is part of:
1 Atlantic Monthly, Oct., 1883, p. 534.
4 At this very moment (Dec. 21, 1837) the Quaker Charles Marriott was writing from Hudson, N. Y., to Mr. Garrison: ‘We are sorry to hear of the indisposition of our dear sisters Grimke at our kind friend Samuel Philbrick's. They have sown much good seed on other subjects besides abolition. The charge that abolitionists are persons of but one idea is pretty well passed off’ (Ms.)
5 Compare Pollen's letter to Channing, Jan. 12, 1837, commending the Grimkes, who ‘devote themselves entirely to the great work of universal emancipation. . . . They are free from the prejudices of those abolitionists who think that the cause can be promoted only in their way; their views of social reform extend far beyond the grossest form of servitude as it exists at the South’ ( “ Life of Chas. Follen,” p. 430).
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 United States License.
An XML version of this text is available for download, with the additional restriction that you offer Perseus any modifications you make. Perseus provides credit for all accepted changes, storing new additions in a versioning system.