This text is part of:
[381]
respective legislatures.
But, after all, it was the ironical fate of the Convention to stand rather as a landmark in the history of the woman question, than in that of abolition.1 For in respect to the grand theatre of the world's anti-slavery struggle, the British and Foreign Society were destined to intervene as obstructionists.
‘They will now, I think,’ wrote Mr. Phillips prophetically in2 June, ‘take sides in our disputes; . . . and they will take sides, most of them, with the new organization.
I except the Scottish and the Irish Friends.’
1 It is commonly treated, with some injustice to the Grimkes, as the initial cause of the woman-suffrage movement in the United States as well as in England. See chap. 3, p. 62, in vol. 1, of Mrs. Stanton's “History of woman suffrage.”
3 Ms.
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 United States License.
An XML version of this text is available for download, with the additional restriction that you offer Perseus any modifications you make. Perseus provides credit for all accepted changes, storing new additions in a versioning system.