[
1045a]
[1]
and the actual
matter of the living body becomes by degeneration the potentiality and
matter of the dead body, and water the matter of vinegar; for the one
becomes the other just as day becomes night.All things which change reciprocally in this
way must return into the matter; e.g., if a living thing is generated
from a dead one, it must first become the matter, and then a living
thing; and vinegar must first become water, and then wine.
With regard to the difficulty which we have described
1 in
connection with definitions and numbers, what is the cause of the
unification? In all things which have a plurality of parts, and which
are not a total aggregate but a whole of some sort distinct from the
parts, there is some
cause ; inasmuch as even in bodies
sometimes contact is the cause of their unity, and sometimes viscosity
or some other such quality.But a definition is
one account, not by connection,
like the
Iliad
, but because it is a definition of one thing.
What is it, then, that makes "man" one
thing, and why does it make him one thing and not many, e.g. "animal"
and "two-footed," especially if, as some say, there is an Idea of
"animal" and an Idea of "two-footed"?Why are not these Ideas "man," and why should
not man exist by participation, not in any "man," but in two Ideas,
those of "animal" and "two-footed"?
[20]
And in general "man" will be not one, but two
things—"animal" and "two-footed." Evidently if we proceed in
this way, as it is usual to define and explain, it will be impossible
to answer and solve the difficulty.But if, as we maintain, man is part matter and
part form—the matter being potentially, and the form
actually man—, the point which we are investigating will no
longer seem to be a difficulty. For this difficulty is just the same
as we should have if the definition of X
2 were "round bronze"; for this name
would give a clue to the formula, so that the question becomes "what
is the cause of the unification of 'round' and 'bronze'?"The difficulty is no longer
apparent, because the one is matter and the other form. What then is
it (apart from the active cause) which causes that which exists
potentially to exist actually in things which admit of generation?
There
is no other cause of the potential sphere's being
an actual sphere; this was the essence of each.
3Some
matter is intelligible and some sensible, and part of the formula is
always matter and part actuality; e.g., the circle is a plane
figure.
4 But such thing
5 as have no matter, neither intelligible nor
sensible, are ipso facto each one of them essentially something one;