This text is part of:
Table of Contents:
[*] 470. The other lyric and elegiac poets show no preference for the simple εἰ. The following cases may be cited: CALL. i. 13 εἰ ᾖ (but ἤν in 17); TYRT. xii. 35 εἰ φύγῃ (but ἤν xi. 16); SOL. iv. 30 εἰ ᾖ? (but ἤν xii. 1, SOL. xiii. 29); THEOG. 121, THEOG. 122 εἰ λελήθῃ . . . ἔχῃ, and 321 εἰ ὀπάσσῃ (but ἤν 93, THEOG. 186, THEOG. 379, THEOG. 697, THEOG. 929, THEOG. 932, THEOG. 1355, THEOG. 1356, THEOG. 1385); all (both εἰ and ἤν) in general conditions. See SIM. AMORG. vii. 15, THEOG. 69, THEOG. 97 (ἤν).
Macmillan. London, Melbourne, Toronto. 1889. reprint edition:. St. Martin's Press. New York. 1965.
The National Endowment for the Humanities provided support for entering this text.
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 United States License.
An XML version of this text is available for download, with the additional restriction that you offer Perseus any modifications you make. Perseus provides credit for all accepted changes, storing new additions in a versioning system.