previous next

[238c] plurality to them?

Theaetetus
Certainly.

Stranger
And in saying “a thing which is not,” do we not equally attribute the singular number?

Theaetetus
Obviously.

Stranger
And yet we assert that it is neither right nor fair to undertake to attribute being to not-being.

Theaetetus
Very true.

Stranger
Do you see, then, that it is impossible rightly to utter or to say or to think of not-being without any attribute, but it is a thing inconceivable, inexpressible, unspeakable, irrational?

Theaetetus
Absolutely.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 United States License.

An XML version of this text is available for download, with the additional restriction that you offer Perseus any modifications you make. Perseus provides credit for all accepted changes, storing new additions in a versioning system.

load focus Greek (1903)
hide Places (automatically extracted)

View a map of the most frequently mentioned places in this document.

Download Pleiades ancient places geospacial dataset for this text.

hide References (4 total)
hide Display Preferences
Greek Display:
Arabic Display:
View by Default:
Browse Bar: