previous next


Yes, if anything can be assumed to be.

Then let us not even undertake to attribute either the singular or the plural of number to not-being.

We should, apparently, not be right in undertaking that, as our argument shows.

How then could a man either utter in speech or even so much as conceive in his mind things which are not, or not-being, apart from number?

Tell me how number is involved in such conceptions.

When we say “things which are not,” do we not attribute

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 United States License.

An XML version of this text is available for download, with the additional restriction that you offer Perseus any modifications you make. Perseus provides credit for all accepted changes, storing new additions in a versioning system.

load focus Greek (1903)
hide Places (automatically extracted)

View a map of the most frequently mentioned places in this document.

Download Pleiades ancient places geospacial dataset for this text.

hide References (2 total)
hide Display Preferences
Greek Display:
Arabic Display:
View by Default:
Browse Bar: