They were sold to us.
One cannot but recall that which is narrated of
Zachary Macaulay, the father of
Thomas Babingham, who made a fortune in the slave trade, and when that was done joined the anti-slavery people, and secured some handsome appointments by attacking the aforesaid business.
It was well said on the floor of the Virginia Legislature by
John Thompson Brown in answer to English invective: ‘They sold us these slaves—they assumed a vendor's responsibility—and it is not for them to question the validity of our title.’
And it was equally relevant to say to some others: ‘Your position involves the right of a grantor to revoke a grant without the consent of the
[
273]
grantee for value and the right of one party to a compact to retain the whole consideration moving to him while repudiating every other.’
A scheme of gradual emancipation had been proposed by
Jefferson as early as 1776 and the general scheme of it approved by the convention which framed
Virginia's Constitution in that year, but no action was taken, because ‘the public mind would not bear it.’
‘Nothing,’ wrote
Jefferson, ‘is more certainly written in the book of fate than that these people are to be free, nor is it less certain that the two races, equally free, cannot live in the same government.
Nature, habit, opinion, have drawn indelible lines of distinction between them.’
Here plainly was a difficult air for statesmanship to breathe, a problem which might well vex the noblest.
By what bond, other than the one existing, could darkest
Africa and free
America, the antipodes in race as in geography, dwell side by side in useful co-operation?
Whatever might be written in the book of fate, when its was equally legible that the two races, equally free, could not live in the same government, what was the solution?
This, on a very different scale from anything which ever existed in the
North, was the problem which confronted the
South—springing from no choice or voice of her own, but against her choice and against her voice.
In 1830 there were movements in
Tennessee,
Kentucky,
Maryland and
Virginia for the gradual emancipation of their slaves, and in
Virginia the movement had nearly succeeded.
It was the aggression of the Abolitionists which arrested the movement in all these States.
