34.
[83]
But somehow or other you have repeated over and over again, and have dwelt
upon the assertion, that you did not choose to connect this case with the
games, lest I, according to my usual custom, should say something about the
sacred cars, for the sake of exciting pity; as I had done before in the case
of other aediles. No doubt you got something by this; for you deprived me of
an embellishment of my speech. I shall be laughed at now if I make any
mention of the sacred cars, after you have predicted that I
should do so. And without the sacred cars what can I find to say? And here
you added, too, that this was the reason why I by my law had established the
penalty of banishment in cases of bribery, that I might be able to sum up my
orations in ways more calculated to excite pity. Does he not, when he says
all this, seem to you to be arguing against some teacher of declamation, and
not with one who is a pupil, as I may say, of the real toils of the forum?
[84]
“Yes, for I was not at
Rhodes,” says he (He
means that I was) “But I was,” says he, (I thought he
was going to say, at Vacca,1) “twice at
Nicaea, in
Bithynia” If the place gives a person any handle for finding fault
with one, I know not why you should think Nicaea stricter than Rhodes if we are to examine into the cause, then you were
in Bithynia with the greatest
credit, and I was at Rhodes with no
less. For as to the point on which you found fault with me, namely, that I
had defended too many people, I wish that you who are able to do it and
others too, who shirk it, were willing to relieve me of this labour. But the
effect of your diligence, who weigh causes so carefully that you reject
almost all of them, is that nearly all causes come to me who am not able to
deny anything to men who are in misery and distress.
[85]
You reminded me also, since you had been in Crete that something might have been said against your
offering yourself as a candidate, and that I let that opportunity slip.
Which of us, then, is more covetous of a smart saying? I, who did not say
what might have been said, or you, who said it even against yourself? You
were fond of saying that you had sent home no letters with accounts of your
exploits, because mine, which I had sent to some one or other, had injured
me. But I am not aware that they did injure me I am quite sure that they
might have been of service to the republic.
This text is part of:
Search the Perseus Catalog for:
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 United States License.
An XML version of this text is available for download, with the additional restriction that you offer Perseus any modifications you make. Perseus provides credit for all accepted changes, storing new additions in a versioning system.