13.
[29]
Did any one all that time hear, not only of any act of yours, or of any
report of yours to the senate of all these transactions, but of even any
word at all uttered by you on the subject or of any complaint of yours? Do
you think that you were consul at that time, you, during whose period of
authority the man who, by means of the authority of the senate, had saved
the republic, and who in Italy had
united all parties of all nations by the celebration of three triumphs, made
up his mind that he could not appear in public with safety? Were you and
your colleague consuls at that time when, if you ever ventured to say one
word on any subject or to submit any motion whatever to the senate, the
whole body raised an outcry against you, and declared that you should do
nothing whatever till you had first made a motion concerning
me and my affairs? and when you both, though in fact you were fettered by
your treaty with that man, still said that you were anxious to do so, but
that were hindered by the law?
[30]
A law which even to private individuals seemed to be no law at all, having
been framed by slaves, posted up by violence, carried by piratical fury when
the senate was driven away when all virtuous men had been frightened from
the forum when the republic had been taken by storm in violation of all laws
whatever, and which was drawn up in violation of every precedent; were men
who said that they were afraid of that law, consuls? could, I will not say
the minds of men, but could any records or annals even style them such? For
even if you did not consider that a law, which was contrary to all law,
being the proscription by the mere power of a tribune of a citizen who had
never been condemned, and the deprivation of his rights and the confiscation
of his property, but nevertheless were held fast by the agreement which you
had made; who would consider you to have been then, not only consuls, but
even free men at all, when your minds were hampered by a bribe, your tongues
padlocked by wages? But if, on the other hand, you, being the only people in
the state who did so, did consider that a law; can any one think that you
were consuls then, or that you are men of consular rank now, you who are
ignorant of the laws, and principles, and usages, and rights of that state
in which you wish to be accounted some of the chief citizens?
[31]
When you were going in your robes as generals into those—provinces
which you had (shall I say bought or stolen?) did any one consider you
consuls? Therefore, I imagine, even if men did abstain from escorting you on
your departure from the city with a numerous attendance to pay you a
compliment and do honour to you, at all events they followed you with their
good wishes as consuls, but with curses as enemies or traitors.
This text is part of:
Search the Perseus Catalog for:
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 United States License.
An XML version of this text is available for download, with the additional restriction that you offer Perseus any modifications you make. Perseus provides credit for all accepted changes, storing new additions in a versioning system.