20.
I feed on these facts, I am delighted, I am in ecstasies at them. I am
delighted that this order thinks of you both as it does of its bitterest
enemies; that the Roman knights, the other orders and the whole state
detests you both; that there is no good man, no, and no citizen who
remembers that he is a citizen, who does not shun you both with his eyes,
reject you with his ears, scorn you in his mind, and shudder at the bare
recollection of your consulship.
[46]
This is
what I have always wished respecting you, this is what I have desired, this
is what I have prayed for. Even more has happened than I could have desired.
For, in truth, I never formed a wish that you should lose your armies. That
has happened quite beyond my wish, though I cannot say that it
has grieved me; but it never could have occurred to me to wish you the
insanity and frenzy into which you have both fallen. Still it might well
have been wished. But I had forgotten that that was the most invariable of
all the punishments which were appointed by the immortal gods for wicked and
impious men.
For think not, O conscript fathers, that, as you see on the stage, wicked men
are, by the instigation of the gods, terrified by the blazing torches of the
Furies. It is his own dishonesty, his own crime, his own wickedness, his own
audacity that deprives each individual of sense and discernment. These are
the Furies, these the flames, these the firebrands which distress the
impious.
[47]
Must I not think you senseless
and frantic, and out of your mind,—must I not think you madder
than that Orestes in the tragedy, or than Athamas, when you dared first of
all to act so, (for this is the head and front of your offending,) and
again, a short time afterwards, when Torquatus, a most influential and
conscientious man, pressed you openly to confess that you left Macedonia, that province into which you
had carried so vast an army, without one single soldier? I say nothing of
your having lost the greater part of your army; that might be owing to your
ill fortune. But what reason can you allege for having disbanded any part of
your army? What power had you to do so? What law, what resolution of the
senate authorized such a step? Where was your right to do so? What precedent
was there for it? What is this but madness, but ignorance of men, ignorance
of the laws, and of the senate, and of the constitution?
To wound one's body is a trifle; to wound one's life, one's character, one's
safety, like this, is a more serious business.
[48]
If you had discharged your household, a matter which
would have concerned no one but yourself, your friends would have thought
that you required to be put under restraint; could you have disbanded the
protection of the republic, the garrison of the province, without the orders
of the Roman senate or people, if you had been in your sound senses?
This text is part of:
Search the Perseus Catalog for:
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 United States License.
An XML version of this text is available for download, with the additional restriction that you offer Perseus any modifications you make. Perseus provides credit for all accepted changes, storing new additions in a versioning system.