The Reforms of Solon
In desperation, the Athenians in 594 B.C.
gave Solon special authority to revise
their laws1 to deal with the economic
crisis and its dire social consequences that had brought their society to the brink of
internecine war. As he explains in his autobiographical poetry, Solon tried to steer a
middle course2 between the demands of the rich to preserve their financial advantages and the
call of the poor for a redistribution of land to themselves from the holdings of the
large landowners. His famous
“shaking off of
obligations”3 somehow freed
those farms whose ownership had become formally encumbered without, however, actually
redistributing any land. He also forbade the selling of Athenians into slavery for debt
and
secured the liberation of citizens who had become slaves4 in this way, commemorating his success in the verses he wrote about his reforms:
“To Athens, their home established by the gods, I brought back many
who had been sold into slavery, some justly, some not ...”5
Attempting to balance political power between rich and poor,
, Solon ranked male
citizens into four classes according to their income6: “five-hundred-measure men”
(pentakosiomedimnoi , those with an annual income
equivalent to that much agricultural produce), “horsemen” (hippeis , income of three hundred measures), “yoked
men” (zeugitai , two hundred measures), and
“laborers” (thetes, less than two
hundred measures). The higher a man's class, the higher the governmental office for
which he was eligible, with the laborer class barred from all posts. Solon did reaffirm
the right of this class to participate in the assembly (ekklesia ), however. Solon probably created
a council (boule) of four hundred7 men to prepare an agenda for the discussions in the
assembly, although some scholars place this innovation later than Solon's time.
Aristocrats could not dominate the council's deliberations because its members were
chosen by lot, probably only from the top three income classes. Solon may also have
initiated a schedule of regular meetings for the assembly. These reforms gave added
impetus to the assembly's legislative role and thus indirectly laid a foundation for the
political influence that the “laborer” (thete ) class would gradually acquire over the next century and a half.