34.
[73]
Then Lucius Cotta, being asked his opinion first, said what was most worthy
of the republic,—that nothing had been done respecting me justly,
nothing according to the usages of our ancestors, nothing according to the
laws that no one could be removed out of the city without a regular trial,
that it not only was illegal for any law to be passed, but that no decision
even could be come to except at the comitia
centuriata, that that was all violence, a flame arising from
the confusion of the republic, and the agitated state of the times, when all
rights and all courts of justice were destroyed, that when a great
revolution was impending, I turned aside a little, and out of hope of future
tranquillity, had shunned the present waves and tempests. Wherefore, as I
had when absent delivered the republic from no less serious dangers than I
had previously when present, he said that it was fitting that I should not
only be restored, but also complimented by the senate. He also discussed
many other points with great wisdom, arguing that that most insane and
profligate enemy of modesty and chastity had framed the law which he had
enacted concerning me in such a manner, in such language and with such
statements of fact that even if it had been legally proposed and earned
still it could not have had any force. Wherefore he said, that as I was not
away because of any law, I ought to be recalled not by a law but by the
authority of the senate.
[74]
There was no one who did not say that this
opinion was most sound. But Cnaeus Pompeius, who was asked his opinion after
him, having expressed his approval of the opinion of Cotta, and praised it,
said that he, for the sake of my tranquillity, in order that I might be in
no subsequent danger from any popular disturbance, voted that the kindness
of the Roman people should be added to the authority of the senate in my
behalf. When all had vied with one another, each one speaking
about my safety in a more dignified and complimentary manner than the other,
and when in fact a unanimous vote was just taking place, up rose, as you
know, Atilius Gavianus; and he did not dare to interpose his veto, although
he had been bought for that purpose, but he asked a night to deliberate on
the matter. Then ensued a great outcry of the senate, and loud complaints
and entreaties: his father-in-law threw himself at his feet. He pledged
himself to cause no delay the next day. He was believed. The senate broke
up. In the meantime that deliberate gentleman, in the course of the long
night that intervened, got his wages doubled. Only a very few days followed
during the whole month of January on which it was lawful for a senate to be
held; but still nothing was discussed except my business.
This text is part of:
Search the Perseus Catalog for:
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 United States License.
An XML version of this text is available for download, with the additional restriction that you offer Perseus any modifications you make. Perseus provides credit for all accepted changes, storing new additions in a versioning system.