13.
What can you do with this man? or for what punishment can you reserve this
profligate citizen,—I should rather say this impious enemy? who,
to pass over other particulars of his character, and other actions which
belong to him in common with his infamous and savage colleague, has this one
thing to boast of peculiar to himself, that he expelled from the city and
banished (I will not say a Roman knight, I will not say a most accomplished
and virtuous man, I will not say a citizen deeply attached to the republic,
I will not say a man who was only joining his own lamentations for the
calamity of his friend and of the republic to those of the senate and of all
good men; it is enough to say that)—he, the consul, banished a
Roman citizen without any trial, by his own simple edict.
[30]
The Latin allies had never anything worse to submit to
than (and it was a case of very rare occurrence) the being ordered by the
consul to depart from the city. And they had the power then of returning to
their own cities, to their own household gods; and in that general disaster
no peculiar ignominy was attached by name to any single individual. But what
is the case here? Is the consul to banish, by his edict, Roman citizens from
their household gods? is he to expel them from their country?
is he to select whom he pleases? to condemn and banish men by name? If he
had supposed that you, who are now sitting here, would continue to exist in
the republic,—if he had supposed that any image of the courts of
justice would remain or that there would be the least vestige of the old
constitution left in the state would he even have dared to wipe the senate
out of the republic in this way? to reject the prayers of the Roman knights?
in short, to overturn the rights and liberties of all the citizens by new
and unheard of edicts?
[31]
Although you are listening to me, O judges, with the greatest attention, and
with exceeding kindness, still I fear that some of you may, perchance,
marvel why I am so prolix, and what is my object in tracing things back so
far, or what connection the offences of those men who harassed the republic
before the tribuneship of Publius Sestius have with his cause now. But my
desire is to show that all the counsels of Publius Sestius, and the whole
object of his tribuneship, was to remedy the misfortunes of the afflicted
and ruined republic as far as was in his power. And pardon me, if in laying
open those wounds, I appear to say rather too much about myself; for you and
all good men decided that that disaster which befell me was the heaviest
possible blow to the republic. And Publius Sestius is now on his trial, not
on his own account, but on mine —for as he devoted all the powers
of his tribuneship to the promotion of my safety it is inevitable that I
should look upon my own cause in past time as united with the defence which
I am now making for him.
This text is part of:
Search the Perseus Catalog for:
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 United States License.
An XML version of this text is available for download, with the additional restriction that you offer Perseus any modifications you make. Perseus provides credit for all accepted changes, storing new additions in a versioning system.