Hide browse bar Your current position in the text is marked in blue. Click anywhere in the line to jump to another position:
section:
The Tenses.
I. Tenses of the Indicative: Present.
Imperfect.
Perfect and Pluperfect.
Aorist.
Future.
Future Perfect.
II. Tenses of the Dependent Moods.
Not in Indirect Discourse.
Present and Aorist.
Subjunctive and Imperative.
Optative.
Infinitive.
Perfect.
Future.
Optative and Infinitive of Indirect Discourse.
Present Optative.
Present Infinitive.
Perfect Optative.
Perfect Infinitive.
Aorist Optative.
Aorist Infinitive.
Future Optative.
Future Infinitive.
Future Perfect.
III. Tenses of the Participle.
Present Participle.
Perfect Participle.
Aorist Participle.
Future Participle.
Gnomic and Iterative tenses: Gnomic Aorist and Perfect.
Iterative Imperfect and Aorist with
ἄν
.—Ionic Iterative Forms in
-σκον
and
-σκόμην
.
Dependence of Moods and Tenses.
Indicative.
Subjunctive and Imperative.
Optative.
Infinitive and Participle.
This text is part of:
Table of Contents:
Chapter II
Chapter IV
Section III: Subjunctive, like the Future Indicative, in
Independent Sentences.—Interrogative Subjunctive.
Peculiar Forms of Conditional Sentences: Substitution and
Ellipsis in Protasis.—Protasis without a Verb.
Homeric and other Poetic Peculiarities in Conditional
Relative Sentences: Subjunctive without
κέ
or
ἄν
.
Temporal Particles signifying Until and Before.:
ἕως
,
ὄφρα, εἰς ὅ
or
εἰσόκε, ἔστε, ἄχρι, μέχρι
, until.
Simple Sentences in Indirect Discourse: Indicative and
Optative after
ὅτι
and
ὡς
, and in Indirect
Questions.
Chapter V
Chapter VI
[*] 93. In a few passages of Homer the aorist subjunctive with μή seems to express a similar fear that something may prove to have already happened; as “δείδοικα μή σε παρείπῃ,” “I fear it may prove that she persuaded you,” Il. i. 555. So Il. x. 98, “μὴ κοιμήσωνται ἄταρ λάθωνται” , and x. 538, “δείδοικα μή τι πάθωσι” , I fear lest it may prove that they have met some harm. The reference to the past here cannot come from any past force of the aorist subjunctive itself, but is probably an inference drawn from the context. As the later language would use a perfect subjunctive in such cases, these aorists seem to be instances of an earlier laxity of usage, like the use of ἀπόλοιτό κε for both would have perished and would perish (440). In Il. x. 537 there is a similar case of the aorist optative in a wish: αἲ γὰρ δὴ ὧδ᾽ ἄφαρ ἐκ Τρώων ἐλασαίατο μώνυχας ἵππους, i.e. may it prove that they have driven the horses away from the Trojans (95).
Macmillan. London, Melbourne, Toronto. 1889. reprint edition:. St. Martin's Press. New York. 1965.
The National Endowment for the Humanities provided support for entering this text.
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 United States License.
An XML version of this text is available for download, with the additional restriction that you offer Perseus any modifications you make. Perseus provides credit for all accepted changes, storing new additions in a versioning system.