[1327a]
[1]
and in addition, on the other hand, the same thing
holds good of the territory that we said about the size of the
population—it must be well able to be taken in at one view, and that
means being a country easy for military defence. As to the site of the city, if
it is to be ideally placed, it is proper for it to be well situated with regard
both to the sea and to the country. One defining principle is that mentioned
above1—the city must be in communication with all parts of the
territory for the purpose of sending out military assistance; and the remaining
principle is that it must be easily accessible for the conveyance to it of the
agricultural produce, and also of timber-wood and any other such material that
the country happens to possess.As to communication with the sea it is in
fact much debated whether it is advantageous to well-ordered states or harmful.
It is maintained that the visits of persons brought up under other institutions
are detrimental to law and order, and so also is a swollen population, which
grows out of sending out abroad and receiving in a number of traders, but is
unfavorable to good government. Now
it is not difficult to see that, if these consequences are avoided, it is
advantageous in respect of both security and the supply of necessary
commodities
[20]
that the city and the
country should have access to the sea. With a view to enduring wars more easily
people that are to be secure must be capable of defensive operations on both
elements, land and sea, and with a view to striking at assailants, even if it be
not possible on both elements, yet to do so on one or the other will be more in
the power of people that have access to both. And the importation of commodities
that they do not happen to have in their own country and the export of their
surplus products are things indispensable; for the state ought to engage in
commerce for its own interest, but not for the interest of the foreigner.
People that throw open their
market to the world do so for the sake of revenue, but a state that is not to
take part in that sort of profit-making need not possess a great commercial
port. But since even now we see many countries and cities possessing sea-ports
and harbors conveniently situated with regard to the city, so as not to form
part of the same town2 and yet not to be too far off, but commanded by
walls and other defence-works of the kind, it is manifest that if any advantage
does result through the communication of city with port the state will possess
this advantage, and if there is any harmful result it is easy to guard against
it by means of laws stating and regulating what persons are not and what persons
are to have intercourse with one another. On the question of naval forces, there is no doubt that to
possess them up to a certain strength is most desirable
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 United States License.
An XML version of this text is available for download, with the additional restriction that you offer Perseus any modifications you make. Perseus provides credit for all accepted changes, storing new additions in a versioning system.