This text is part of:
Search the Perseus Catalog for:
[90]
“Again; suppose there were two to be saved from
the sinking ship—both of them wise men—and only
one small plank, should both seize it to save themselves? Or should one give place to the other?”
“Why of course, one should give place to the
other, but that other must be the one whose life is
more valuable either for his own sake or for that of
his country.”
“But what if these considerations are of equal
weight in both?”
“Then there will be no contest, but one will give
place to the other, as if the point were decided by
lot or at a game of odd and even.”
“Again, suppose a father were robbing temples or
making underground passages to the treasury, should
a son inform the officers of it?”
“Nay; that were a crime; rather should he defend
his father, in case he were indicted.”
“Well, then, are not the claims of country paramount to all other duties?”
[p. 367]
“Aye, verily; but it is to our country's interest to
have citizens who are loyal to their parents.”
“But once more—if the father attempts to make
himself king, or to betray his country, shall the son
hold his peace?”
“Nay, verily; he will plead with his father not to
do so. If that accomplishes nothing, he will take
him to task; he will even threaten; and in the end,
if things point to the destruction of the state, he
will sacrifice his father to the safety of his country.”
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 United States License.
An XML version of this text is available for download, with the additional restriction that you offer Perseus any modifications you make. Perseus provides credit for all accepted changes, storing new additions in a versioning system.