authority of the Almighty.
Whenever you can get these Northern audiences to adopt the opinion that slavery is right on the other side of the Ohio
; whenever you can get them, in pursuance of Douglas
's views, to adopt that sentiment, they will very readily make the other argument, which is perfectly logical, that that which is right on that side of the Ohio
, cannot be wrong on this, and that if you have that property on that side of the Ohio
, under the seal and stamp of the Almighty, when by any means it escapes over here, it is wrong to have Constitutions and laws “to devil” you about it. So Douglas
is moulding the public opinion of the North
, first to say that the thing is right in your State over the Ohio river
, and hence to say that that which is right there is not wrong here, and that all laws and Constitutions here, recognizing it as, being wrong, are themselves wrong, and ought to be repealed and abrogated.
He will tell you, men of Ohio
, that if you choose here to have laws against slavery, it is in conformity to the idea that your climate is not suited to it, that your climate is not suited to slave labor, and therefore you have Constitutions and laws against it.
Let us attend to that argument for a little while and see if it be sound.
You do not raise sugar-cane (except the new-fashioned sugar-cane, and you wont raise that long), but they do raise it in Louisiana
You dont raise it in Ohio
because you cant raise it profitably, because the climate dont suit it. They do raise it in Louisiana
because there it is profitable.
will tell you that is precisely the slavery question.
That they do have slaves there because they are profitable, and you dont have them here because they are not profitable.
If that is so, then it leads to dealing with the one precisely as with the other.
Is there then any thing in the Constitution
or laws of Ohio
against raising sugar-cane?
Have you found it necessary to put any such provision in your law?
No man desires to raise sugar-cane in Ohio
; but, if any man did desire to do so, you would say it was a tyrannical law that forbids his doing so, and whenever you shall agree with Douglas
, whenever your minds are brought to adopt his argument, as surely you will have reached the conclusion, that although slavery is not profitable in Ohio
, if any man wants it, it is wrong to him not to let him have it.
In this matter Judge Douglas
is preparing the public mind for you of Kentucky
, to make perpetual that good thing in your estimation, about which you and I differ.
In this connection let me ask your attention to another thing.
I believe it is safe to assert that five years ago, no living man had expressed the opinion that the negro had no share in the Declaration of Independence
Let me state that again : five years ago no living man had expressed the opinion that the negro had no share in the Declaration of Independence
If there is in this large, audience any man who ever knew of that opinion being put upon paper as much as five years ago, I will be obliged to him now or at a subsequent time to show it.
If that be true I wish you then to note the next fact ; that within the space of five years Senator Douglas
, in the argument of this question, has got his entire party, so far as I know, without exception, to join in saying that the negro has no share in the Declaration of Independence
If there be now in all these United States
man that does not say this, I have been unable upon any occasion to scare him up. Now if none of you said this five years ago, and all of you say it now, that is a matter that you Kentuckians ought to note.
That is a vast change in the Northern
public sentiment upon that question.
Of what tendency is that change?
The tendency of that change is to bring the public mind to the conclusion that when men are spoken of, the negro is not meant ; that when negroes are spoken of, brute alone are contemplated.
That change in public sentiment has already degraded the black man in the estimation of Douglas
and his followers from the condition of a man of some sort, and assigned him to the condition of a brute.
Now, you Kentuckians ought to give Douglas
credit for this.
That is the largest possible stride that can be made in regard to the perpetuation of your thing of slavery.
A voice--“Speak to Ohio
men, and not to Kentuckians!”
--I beg permission to speak as I please.