negro to vote, provided he owns $250 worth of property.
New York thinks that a negro ought to be permitted to vote, provided he is rich, but not otherwise.
They allow the aristocratic negro to vote there.
I never saw the wisdom, the propriety or the justice of that decision on the part of New York, and yet it never occurred to me that I had a right to find fault with that State.
It is her business ; she is a sovereign State, and has a right to do as she pleases, and if she will take care of her own negroes, making such regulations concerning them as suit her, and let us alone, I will mind my business, and not interfere with her. In Kentucky
they will not give a negro any political or any civil rights.
I shall not argue the question whether Kentucky
in so doing has decided right or wrong, wisely or unwisely.
It is a question for Kentucky
to decide for herself.
I believe that the Kentuckians have consciences as well as ourselves; they have as keen a perception of their religious, moral and social duties as we have, and I am willing that they shall decide this slavery question for themselves, and be accountable to their God for their action.
It is not for me to arraign them for what they do. I will not judge them lest I shall be judged.
mind her own business, and take care of her negroes, and we attend to our own affairs, and take care of our negroes, and we will be the best of friends ; but if Kentucky
attempts to interfere with us, or we with her, there will be strife, there will be discord, there will be relentless hatred, there will be everything but fraternal feeling and brotherly love.
It is not necessary that you should enter Kentucky
and interfere in that State, to use the language of Mr. Lincoln
It is just as offensive to interfere from this State, or send your missiles over there.
I care not whether an enemy, if he is going to assault us, shall actually come into our State, or come along the line, and throw his bomb-shells over to explode in our midst.
should plant a battery on the Canadian
side of the Niagara river
, opposite Buffalo
, and throw bomb-shells over, which would explode in Main street, in that city, and destroy the buildings, and that, when we protested, she would say, in the language of Mr. Lincoln
, that she never dreamed of coming into the United States
to interfere with us, and that she was just throwing her bombs over the line from her own side, which she had a right to do, would that explanation satisfy us?
So it is with Mr. Lincoln
He is not going into Kentucky
, but he will plant his batteries on this side of the Ohio
, where he is safe and secure for a retreat, and will throw his bomb-shells-his abolition documents-over the river, and will carry on a political warfare, and get up strife between the North
and the South
until he elects a sectional President
, reduces the South
to the condition of dependent colonies, raises the negro to an equality, and forces the South
to submit to the doctrine that a house divided against itself cannot stand — that the Union
divided into half slave States and half free cannot endure — that they must all be slave or they must all be free, and that as we in the North
are in the majority, we will not permit them to be all slave, and therefore they in the South
must consent to the States all being free.
Now, fellow-citizens, I submit to you whether these doctrines are consistent with the peace and harmony of this Union?
I submit to you whether they are consistent with our duties as citizens of a common confederacy; whether they are consistent with the principles which ought to govern brethern of the same family?
I recognize all the people of these States, North and South, East and West, old or new, Atlantic or Pacific, as our brethren, flesh of one flesh, and I will do no act unto them that I would not be willing they should do unto us. I would apply the same Christian rule to the States of this Union that we are taught to apply to individuals, “do unto others as you would have others do unto you,” and this would secure peace.
Why should this slavery agitation be kept up?
Does it benefit the white man or the slave?
Who does it benefit except the Republican
politicians, who use it as their hobby to ride into office?
Why, I repeat, should it he continued?
Why cannot we be content to administer this Government as it was made — a confederacy of sovereign and independent States?
Let us recognize the sovereignty and independence of each State, refrain from