[
226]
peace or war. He spoke guardedly, and yet not enigmatically.
He skillfully analyzed the treasonable movements of the Oligarchy, exposed the falsehood of their pretenses, the real springs of their ambition and their crime, and pleaded with powerful argumentation for affiliation and union.
He declared his adherence to the
Union in its integrity and with all its parts,. with his friends, with his party, with his State, with his country, or without either, as they might determine; in every event, whether of peace or war, with every consequence of honor or of dishonor, of life or of death.
He concluded by saying :--“I shall cheerfully lend to the
Government my best support in whatever prudent, yet energetic efforts it shall make to preserve the public peace, and to maintain and preserve the
Union, advising only that it practice, as far as possible, the utmost moderation, forbearance, and conciliation.”
The speeches of
Toombs,
Hunter, and
Seward were key-notes to all that.
succeeded on the great topic of the hour.
There were others of eminent ability, and worthy of careful preservation in the annals of the great
Civil War, as exponents of the conflicting views entertained concerning the
Government, its character, and its power.
1 Several of these were from representatives of Slave-labor States, and were extremely loyal.
Foremost among them was that of
Andrew Johnson, Senator from
Tennessee, now
President of the
Republic — a man who had come up from among the common people, planted himself firmly on the foundation of human rights and popular prerogatives, and performed valorous service against the pretensions and claims of the imperious Oligarchy.
“I will not give up this Government,” he said, “that is now called an experiment, which some are prepared to abandon for a constitutional monarchy.
No! I intend to stand by it, and I entreat every man throughout the nation who is a patriot, and who has seen ”