[
461]
the
Conditional Unionists bound the stalwart limbs of her Samson-her National allegiance — while it was reposing its head trustfully in the lap of Delilah — the Slave power; and that they came near being instrumental (though not intentionally) in putting out its eyes, and making it grind ignobly in the prison-house of the “Confederate” Philistines.
Perhaps the records of the war in
Kentucky, that may be found in future pages of this work, may aid us in forming a correct judgment in the matter.
It is certain that the record contains some very instructive lessons concerning the danger to a free people of class legislation and class domination.
Whenever a single interest overshadows all others, and is permitted to shape the public policy of a subordinate commonwealth, or a great nation, the liberties of the people are in danger.
While the zealous loyalists of
Kentucky were restrained and made comparatively inactive by what they deemed an unwise and mischievous policy, those of
Missouri were struggling manfully to keep the
State from revolution and ruin.
We have observed how strongly the people declared for the
Union in their election of delegates to the State Convention, which assembled at
Jefferson City on the 28th of February.
In that Convention there was
not a single openly avowed disunionist, but there were a few secret ones and many Conditional
Unionists.
1 Notwithstanding the slaves in
Missouri were less than one-tenth of the population, and the real and best interests of the
State were in close affinity with free labor, the Slave power, which embraced a large number of active politicians, was potential.
These politicians were mostly of the
Virginia and
South Carolina school, and through their exertions the disloyal
Claiborne F. Jackson was elected Governor of the
State.
2
On the second day of its session the Missouri Convention adjourned to
St. Louis, where it reassembled on the 4th of March,
in the Mercantile Library
Hall, with
Sterling Price as
President, and
Samuel A. Lowe as
Secretary.
Price, who had been
Governor of
Missouri, and who afterward became one of the most active generals in the “Confederate” service in the
Southwest, had obtained his election to the
Convention under the false pretense of being a Unionist, and hoped, no doubt, to find a sufficient number of disloyal men in that body to enable him and his political friends to precipitate
Missouri into revolution.
He was mistaken, and was