οἵως ἔχεις. The adv. “οἵως” has been suspected, but there is no good reason for doubting that it was in use, though less frequent than “οἷον” or “οἷα”: it appears sound in Ar. Vesp. 1363, and in Apoll. Rh. 4. 786; though in Ph. 1007 we should read “οἰ̔̂ αὖ μ᾽ ὑπῆλθες”.—For “οἷος..οἵως”, cp. 557.
This text is part of:
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 United States License.
An XML version of this text is available for download, with the additional restriction that you offer Perseus any modifications you make. Perseus provides credit for all accepted changes, storing new additions in a versioning system.