[1062] ἄρσετε: Rzach rightly explains this as the pl. of the aor. imper. ἄρσον, which we find in Od. 2. 353. For the sigmatic aor. with thematic vowel ε (cf. ἄξετε, Il. 3. 105) v. Monro, H.G. 41, Curt. G.V. ii 282 sqq. Wellauer takes ἄρσετε as futurum pro imperativo, but there is no epic fut. ἄρσω, and the imperatives in 1061, 1063 preclude this possibility. Similarly ὄρσετε in 1067 is an aor. imper.