This text is part of:
Table of Contents:
2. οὐκ ἐπερωτήσω, i.e. I will not repeat the question, already asked in §§ 63, 66, 69, 71. 8, 9. λέγων...διδούς: these parti- ciples are imperfect, and so contrasted with the preceding βοηθήσας etc. Few venture to accept δούς for διδούς, though it is supported by Σ and L. Vömel says: “Nec puto Demosthenis aures tolerasse continuatas syllabas—δῶς δούς. Sed in talibus nihil affirmarim.”
Demosthenes de Corona. William Watson Goodwin. 1904. Cambridge University Press.
The National Endowment for the Humanities provided support for entering this text.
Purchase a copy of this text (not necessarily the same edition) from Amazon.com
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 United States License.
An XML version of this text is available for download, with the additional restriction that you offer Perseus any modifications you make. Perseus provides credit for all accepted changes, storing new additions in a versioning system.