[229] εὐΗγενέος: the presence of the “η” is difficult to explain; it may be due to false analogy with such words as “εὐήνωρ”, where “η” is quite regular. Cf. Il. 11.427 and Il. 23.81 (where it has been corrupted in several MSS. into the common form “εὐγενής”, as in this passage also). Aristoph. and Rhianus on Il. 23.81 read “εὐηφενέων” which is now confirmed by inscriptions (Schulze Q. E. p. 34, Herwerden Lex. s.v. “ἄφενος”). But “εὐηφενής”, “wealthy,” is impossible here. For “εὐγενής” in this connexion Ilgen compares Eur. Ion242“εὐγενῆ παρηι?δα”, Eur. Hel.135“εὐγενῆ δέρην”. The assonance with “γενείου” is no doubt accidental.
This text is part of:
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 United States License.
An XML version of this text is available for download, with the additional restriction that you offer Perseus any modifications you make. Perseus provides credit for all accepted changes, storing new additions in a versioning system.