[
615]
Congress had a right to judge of the qualifications of its members, and with the belief that disloyal men would not be allowed to enter that body over the bar of a test oath prescribed by law.
1
When Congress assembled,
the subject of reorganization was among the first business of the session, and by a joint resolution a committee of fifteen was appointed
2 to make inquiries and report.
This was known as the “Reconstruction Committee.”
This action offended the
President.
It was an interference of the representatives of the people with his chosen policy of reorganization, and hostility to Congress was soon openly manifested by him. This was vehemently declared by the
President in a speech to the populace in front of the
Presidential Mansion on the 22d of February,
--a speech which
Americans would gladly blot from the record of their country — in which, forgetting the dignity of his position and the gravity of the questions at issue, he denounced, by name, leading members of Congress, and the party which had given him their confidence.
The American people felt humiliated by this act, but it was a small matter when compared with what occurred later in the year,
when the
President and a part of his Cabinet, with the pretext of honoring the deceased
Senator Douglas by being present at the dedication of a monument to his memory at
Chicago, on the 6th of September, made a journey to that city and beyond.
He harangued the people in language utterly unbecoming the
chief magistrate of a nation, and attempted to sow the dangerous seeds of sedition by denouncing Congress as an illegal body, deserving of no respect from the people, and the majority of its members as traitors, “trying to break up the
Government.”
That journey of the
President, so disgraceful in all its features-its low partisan object, its immoral performances, and its pitiful results-forms a dark paragraph in the history of the
Republic.
3