12% of the text is displayed below. If you wish to view the entire text, please click here

Chapter 1: the casualties of war — maximum of killed in Union regiments — maximum of percentages.

Wars and battles are considered great in proportion to the loss of life resulting from them. Bloodless battles excite no interest. A campaign of mancoeuvres is accorded but a small place in history. There have been battles as decisive as Waterloo and Gettysburg; but they cost few lives and never became historic. Great as were the results, Waterloo and Gettysburg would receive but little mention were it not for the terrible cost at which the results were obtained.

Still, it is difficult to comprehend fully what is implied by the figures which represent the loss of life in a great battle or a war. As the numbers become great, they convey no different idea, whether they be doubled or trebled. It is only when the losses are considered in detail — by regiments, for instance — that they can be definitely understood. The regiment is the unit of organization. It is to the army what a family is to the city. It has a well known limit of size, and its losses are intelligible; just as a loss in a family can be understood, while the greater figures of the city's mortuary statistics leave no impression on the mind.

The history of a battle or a war should always be studied in connection with the figures which show the losses. By overlooking them an indefinite, and often erroneous, idea is obtained. By neglecting them, many historians fail to develop the important points of the contest. They use the same rhetorical description for different attacks, whether the pressure was strong or weak; the loss, great or small; the fight, bloody or harmless.

To properly understand the relative importance of the various movements on a battle field, the student must know the loss of life at the different points of the line. He will then see where the points of contact really were; where the pressure was greatest; where the scenes of valor and heroism occurred. There is no better way of doing this than by noting the place in the line held by the various regiments and ascertaining the loss of life in each.

There were over two thousand regiments in the Union Armies. On some of these the brunt of battle fell much heavier than on others. While some were exempted from the [2] dangers of active service, others were continually at the front. While some were seldom called upon to face the enemy's fire, others were repeatedly ordered into the thickest of the fight. While in some regiments the number of killed was small, in others the Roll of Honor was unequaled in the records of modern wars. Who were these men who fought so well in defense of their flag? What were the names and numbers of their regiments? What were the losses in these regiments? What limit is there to the toll of blood exacted from a regimental thousand during a long and bloody war?

The one regiment, in all the Union Armies, which sustained the greatest loss in battle, during the American Civil War, was the Fifth New Hampshire Infantry.1 It lost 295 men, killed or mortally wounded in action, during its four years of service, from 1861 to 1865. It served in the First Division, Second Corps. This division was commanded, successively, by Generals Richardson, Hancock, Caldwell, Barlow, and Miles; and any regiment that followed the fortunes of these men was sure to find plenty of bloody work cut out for it. The losses of the Fifth New Hampshire occurred entirely in aggressive, hard, stand — up fighting; none of it happened in routs or through blunders. Its loss includes eighteen officers killed, a number far in excess of the usual proportion, and indicates that the men were bravely led. Its percentage of killed is also very large, especially as based on the original enrollment. The exact percentage of the total enrollment cannot be definitely ascertained, as the rolls were loaded down in 1864 with the names of a large number of conscripts and bounty men who never joined the regiment.

The second highest in the list of infantry regiments having the greatest number killed in battle, is the Eighty-third Pennsylvania, which lost 282 officers and men who died while fighting for the Union. This was a Fifth Corps regiment, serving in Morell's — afterwards Griffin's--First Division. Two of its Colonels were killed, and a third was badly wounded and crippled for life. It was a splendid regiment, well officered and well drilled. It suffered a severe loss in killed, by percentage, as well as in numbers.

The next regiment on the list is the Seventh Wisconsin Infantry, of the famous Iron Brigade, Wadsworth's (First) Division, First Corps. This gallant regiment stands high in the list, because of its many battles and the persistency with which it would hold its ground in the face of the deadliest musketry. By glancing at the table of percentages, it will be seen that the Seventh occupies an honorable place in that list also.

Next, among the regiments sustaining the greatest loss in action, stands the Fifth Michigan, of the Third Corps, in which 263 were killed; and next, comes the Twentieth Massachusetts, of the Second Corps, with a credit of 260 killed in battle.

The following table will show clearly the relative position of the leading infantry regiments in point of numerical loss. It embraces every infantry regiment in the Union Armies which lost over 200 men, killed or mortally wounded in action, during the war. In all, there are forty-five: [3]

Killed or died of wounds.

Regiment. Division. Corps. Officers. Men. Total.
5th New Hampshire Barlow's Second 18 277 295
83d Pennsylvania Griffin's Fifth 11 271 282
7th Wisconsin Wadsworth's First 10 271 281
5th Michigan Birney's Third 16 247 263
20th Massachusetts Gibbon's Second 17 243 260
69th New York Barlow's Second 13 246 259
28th Massachusetts Barlow's Second 15 235 250
16th Michigan Griffin's Fifth 12 235 247
105th Pennsylvania Birney's Third 14 231 245
6th Wisconsin Wadsworth's First 15 229 244
15th Massachusetts Gibbon's Second 14 227 241
15th New Jersey Wright's Sixth 8 232 240
2d Wisconsin Wadsworth's First 10 228 238
40th New York Birney's Third 9 229 238
61st Pennsylvania Getty's Sixth 19 218 237
11th Pennsylvania Robinson's First 12 224 236
48th New York Terry's Tenth 18 218 236
45th Pennsylvania Potter's Ninth 13 214 227
121st New York Wright's Sixth 13 213 226
27th Michigan Willcox's Ninth 10 215 225
2d Michigan Willcox's Ninth 11 214 225
100th Pennsylvania Stevenson's Ninth 16 208 224
8th Michigan Willcox's Ninth 11 212 223
2d Vermont Getty's Sixth 6 215 221
111th New York Hays's(Alex.) Second 8 212 220
18th U. S. Infantry Johnson's Fourteenth 9 209 218
9th Illinois Dodge's Sixteenth 5 211 216
22d Massachusetts Griffin's Fifth 9 207 216
5th Vermont Getty's Sixth 11 202 213
148th Pennsylvania Barlow's Second 12 198 210
9th Massachusetts Griffin's Fifth 15 194 209
81st Pennsylvania Barlow's Second 18 190 208

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 United States License.

An XML version of this text is available for download, with the additional restriction that you offer Perseus any modifications you make. Perseus provides credit for all accepted changes, storing new additions in a versioning system.

hide People (automatically extracted)
Sort people alphabetically, as they appear on the page, by frequency
Click on a person to search for him/her in this document.
John Gibbon (28)
William Birney (24)
Francis C. Barlow (24)
Simon G. Griffin (16)
George W. Getty (15)
James S. Wadsworth (14)
John G. Wright (13)
Thomas J. Wood (12)
Willcox (12)
Philip H. Sheridan (8)
Robert B. Potter (8)
S. W. Crawford (8)
Ricketts (7)
Alfred H. Terry (6)
A. S. Williams (5)
John Newton (5)
Doubleday (5)
Zina H. Robinson (4)
Quinby (4)
Judson Kilpatrick (4)
E. Johnson (4)
David S. Stanley (3)
Schurz (3)
Andrew A. Humphreys (3)
Joseph Hooker (3)
John W. Geary (3)
Grenville M. Dodge (3)
Adelbert Ames (3)
Charles R. Woods (2)
T. J. Wood (2)
John M. Thayer (2)
Von Steinwehr (2)
Morell (2)
Jacob G. Lauman (2)
Hancock (2)
A. J. Grover (2)
D. M. Gregg (2)
Edward Ferrero (2)
Jefferson C. Davis (2)
W. T. Brooks (2)
Frank P. Blair (2)
William H. Baird (2)
Woodruff (1)
Henry Wilson (1)
Godfrey Weitzel (1)
Weir (1)
Weeden (1)
Wagoner (1)
Alfred T. Torbert (1)
Thos (1)
Joseph Thoburn (1)
George Sykes (1)
Stewart (1)
Steward (1)
Truman H. Seymour (1)
Seeley (1)
Sands (1)
Israel B. Richardson (1)
Thomas E. Ransom (1)
Randolph (1)
Phillips (1)
Pettit (1)
P. J. Osterhaus (1)
Joseph A. Mower (1)
Nelson A. Miles (1)
John McArthur (1)
John A. Logan (1)
Kirby (1)
Kern (1)
Kautz (1)
Hazzard (1)
Hazlitt (1)
William B. Hazen (1)
Alexander Hays (1)
Gunther (1)
Walton Dwight (1)
Cushing (1)
Cowan (1)
John M. Corse (1)
S. Cooper (1)
Carlin (1)
J. N. Caldwell (1)
Hiram Burnham (1)
J. M. Brannan (1)
Bradbury (1)
Bigelow (1)
Hiram Berdan (1)
Alex (1)
hide Dates (automatically extracted)
Sort dates alphabetically, as they appear on the page, by frequency
Click on a date to search for it in this document.
1864 AD (3)
1800 AD (2)
1866 AD (1)
August 9th, 1865 AD (1)
June, 1865 AD (1)
1865 AD (1)
May, 1864 AD (1)
1862 AD (1)
October, 1861 AD (1)
1861 AD (1)
1200 AD (1)
1052 AD (1)
1025 AD (1)
hide Display Preferences
Greek Display:
Arabic Display:
View by Default:
Browse Bar: