[
1066b]
[1]
Further, it may be infinite in respect
of addition or of subtraction or of both.
That the infinite should be a separate independent entity,
1 and yet imperceptible, is impossible.For if it is neither magnitude
nor plurality, but infinity itself is the essence of it, and not
merely an accident, it must be indivisible; because that which is
divisible is either magnitude or plurality. And if it is indivisible
it cannot be infinite, except in the same way as sound is invisible.
But this is not what people mean by infinite; and it is not the
infinite in this sense that we are investigating, but the infinite in
the sense of the untraversable.
Again, how can
the infinite exist independently unless number and magnitude, of which
infinity is an attribute, also exist independently?
2 And
further, if the infinite is accidental, it cannot, qua infinite, be an element of things; just as the
invisible is not an element of speech, although sound is invisible. It
is clear also that the infinite cannot exist actually.Otherwise any part of it which
we might take would be infinite; for infinity and the infinite are the
same, if the infinite is substance and is not predicated of a subject.
Therefore it is either indivisible, or if it is partible, the parts
into which it is divisible are infinite. But the same thing cannot be
many infinites; for just as a part of air is air, so a part of the
infinite will be infinite, if the infinite is a substance and
principle.Therefore
it is impartible and indivisible. But this is impossible of the
actually infinite, because it must be some quantity. Therefore
infinity is an accidental attribute. But if so,
[20]
as we have said, it cannot be it that
is a principle, but that of which it is an accident: air
3 or "the even."
4The foregoing inquiry is general; but what
follows will show that the infinite does not exist in sensible
things.If the
definition of a body is "that which is bounded by surfaces," then no
body, whether sensible or intelligible, can be infinite nor can there
be any separate and infinite number, since number or that which
involves number is numerable. This is clearly shown by the following
concrete argument. The infinite can neither be composite nor simple.
For (a) it cannot be a composite body if the elements are limited in
number
5;for the contraries must be equal, and no one of them must be
infinite; for if the potency of one of the two corporeal elements is
in any way inferior, the finite element will be destroyed by the
infinite. And every element cannot be infinite, because body is that
which has extension in all directions, and the infinite is that which
is extended without limit; so that if the infinite is corporeal it
will be infinite in all directions.
6 Nor (b)
can the infinite be any simple body; neither, as some
7 hold, something which
is apart from the elements and from which they suppose the elements to
be generated (for there is no such body apart from the elements;
everything can be resolved into that of which it consists, but we do
not see things resolved into anything apart from the simple bodies),