This text is part of:
Search the Perseus Catalog for:
[1044a]
[1]
so neither the definition nor the essence will
continue to exist if something is subtracted from or added to it. And
(c) a number must be something in virtue of which it is a unity
(whereas our opponents cannot say what makes it one); that is, if it
is a unity.For either it
is not a unity but a kind of aggregate, or if it is a unity, we must
explain what makes a unity out of a plurality. And the definition is a
unity; but similarly they cannot explain the definition either. This
is a natural consequence, for the same reason applies to both, and
substance is a unity in the way which we have explained, and not as
some thinkers say: e.g. because it is a kind of unit or point; but
each substance is a kind of actuality and nature.Also (d) just as a number does not
admit of variation in degree, so neither does substance in the sense
of form; if any substance does admit of this, it is substance in
combination with matter.1Let this suffice as a detailed account of the
generation and destruction of so-called substances, in what sense they
are possible and in what sense they are not; and of the reference of
things to number.As regards material substance, we must
not fail to realize that even if all things are derived from the same
primary cause, or from the same things as primary causes2; i.e. even if all things that are
generated have the same matter for their first principle, nevertheless
each thing has some matter peculiar to it; e.g., "the sweet" or "the
viscous" is the proximate matter of mucus, and "the bitter" or some
such thing is that of bile—
[20]
although probably mucus and bile are derived from
the same ultimate matter.The result is that there is more than one matter of the same thing,
when one thing is the matter of the other; e.g., mucus is derived from
"the viscous"; and from "the sweet," if "the viscous" is derived from
"the sweet"; and from bile, by the analysis of bile into its ultimate
matter. For there are two senses in which X comes from Y; either
because X will be found further on than Y in the process of
development, or because X is produced when Y is analyzed into its
original constituents.And
different things can be generated by the moving cause when the matter
is one and the same, e.g. a chest and a bed from wood. But some
different things must necessarily have different matter; e.g., a saw
cannot be generated from wood, nor does this lie in the power of the
moving cause, for it cannot make a saw of wool or wood.If, then, it is possible to make the same thing from different
matter, clearly the art, i.e. the moving principle, is the same; for
if both the matter and the mover are different, so too is the
product.So whenever we inquire
what the cause is, since there are causes in several senses, we must
state all the possible causes.E.g., what is the material cause of a man? The
menses. What is the moving cause? The semen. What is the formal cause?
The essence. What is the final cause? The end.
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 United States License.
An XML version of this text is available for download, with the additional restriction that you offer Perseus any modifications you make. Perseus provides credit for all accepted changes, storing new additions in a versioning system.