This text is part of:
Search the Perseus Catalog for:
[1049b]
[1]
since
they are both indefinite.Thus it has
now been stated when a thing should be said to exist potentially, and
when it should not.Now since we have distinguished1 the several senses of priority, it is
obvious that actuality is prior to potentiality. By potentiality I
mean not that which we have defined as "a principle of change which is
in something other than the thing changed, or in that same thing qua other," but in general any principle of
motion or of rest; for nature also is in the same genus as
potentiality, because it is a principle of motion, although not in
some other thing, but in the thing itself qua
itself.2To every potentiality of this kind
actuality is prior, both in formula and in substance; in time it is
sometimes prior and sometimes not.That
actuality is prior in formula is evident; for it is because it can be
actualized that the potential, in the primary sense, is potential, I
mean, e.g., that the potentially constructive is that which can
construct, the potentially seeing that which can see, and the
potentially visible that which can be seen.The same principle holds in all other cases
too, so that the formula and knowledge of the actual must precede the
knowledge of the potential.In time it
is prior in this sense: the actual is prior to the potential with
which it is formally identical, but not to that with which it is
identical numerically.What
I mean is this:
[20]
that the
matter and the seed and the thing which is capable of seeing, which
are potentially a man and corn and seeing, but are not yet so
actually, are prior in time to the individual man and corn and seeing
subject which already exist in actuality.But prior in time to these potential entities
are other actual entities from which the former are generated; for the
actually existent is always generated from the potentially existent by
something which is actually existent—e.g., man by man,
cultured by cultured—there is always some prime mover; and
that which initiates motion exists already in actuality.We have said3
in our discussion of substance that everything which is generated is
generated from something and by something; and by something formally
identical with itself.Hence it seems impossible that a man can be a builder if he has
never built, or a harpist if he has never played a harp; because he
who learns to play the harp learns by playing it, and similarly in all
other cases.This was the
origin of the sophists' quibble that a man who does not know a given
science will be doing that which is the object of that science,
because the learner does not know the science. But since something of
that which is being generated is already generated, and something of
that which is being moved as a whole is already moved (this is
demonstrated in our discussion on Motion4),
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 United States License.
An XML version of this text is available for download, with the additional restriction that you offer Perseus any modifications you make. Perseus provides credit for all accepted changes, storing new additions in a versioning system.