[
1024b]
[1]
(c) In the sense
that the plane is the "genus" of plane figures, and the solid of
solids (for each one of the figures is either a particular plane or a
particular solid); i.e., that which underlies the
differentiae.(d) In
the sense that in formulae the first component, which is stated as
part of the essence, is the genus, and the qualities are said to be
its differentiae. The term "genus," then, is used in all these
senses—(a) in respect of continuous generation of the same
type; (b) in respect of the first mover of the same type as the things
which it moves; (c) in the sense of material. For that to which the
differentia or quality belongs is the substrate, which we call
material.
Things are called "generically
different" whose immediate substrates are different and cannot be
resolved one into the other or both into the same thing. E.g., form
and matter are generically different, and all things which belong to
different categories of being; for some of the things of which being
is predicated denote the essence, others a quality, and others the
various other things which have already been distinguished. For these
also cannot be resolved either into each other or into any one
thing.
"False" means: (i) false as a
thing ; (a) because it is not or cannot be substantiated;
such are the statements that the diagonal of a square is
commensurable,
[20]
or that
you are sitting. Of these one is false always, and the other
sometimes; it is in these senses that these things are not
facts.(b) Such
things as really exist, but whose nature it is to seem either such as
they are not, or like things which are unreal; e.g. chiaroscuro and
dreams. For these are really something, but not that of which they
create the impression. Things, then, are called false in these senses:
either because they themselves are unreal, or because the impression
derived from them is that of something unreal.
(2.) A
false statement is the statement of
what is not, in so
far as the statement is false. Hence every definition is untrue of
anything other than that of which it is true; e.g., the definition of
a circle is untrue of a triangle. Now in one sense there is only one
definition of each thing, namely that of its essence; but in another
sense there are many definitions,
1 since the thing itself, and the thing itself
qualified (e.g. "Socrates"
and "cultured Socrates") are
in a sense the same.But
the false definition is not strictly a definition of anything. Hence
it was foolish of Antisthenes
2 to insist that nothing can be
described except by its proper definition: one predicate for one
subject; from which it followed that contradiction is impossible, and
falsehood
3 nearly
so. But it is possible to describe everything not only by its own
definition but by that of something else; quite falsely, and yet also
in a sense truly—e.g., 8 may be described as "double" by the
definition of 2.