[
374a]
by no small increment, but
by a whole army, that will march forth and fight it out with assailants in
defence of all our wealth and the luxuries we have just
described.” “How so?” he said; “are
the citizens themselves
1 not sufficient
for it?” “Not if you,” said I, “and
we all were right in the admission we made when we were molding our city. We
surely agreed, if you remember, that it is impossible for one man to do the
work of many arts well.” “True,” he said.
“Well, then,” said I,
[
374b]
“don't you think that the business of fighting is an art and a
profession?” “It is indeed,” he said.
“Should our concern be greater, then, for the cobbler's art than
for the art of war?” “By no means.”
“Can we suppose,
2 then, that while we were at pains to prevent
the cobbler from attempting to be at the same time a farmer, a weaver, or a
builder instead of just a cobbler, to the end that
3
we might have the cobbler's business well done, and similarly assigned to
each and every one man one occupation, for which he was fit and naturally
adapted and at which he was to work all his days,
[
374c]
at leisure
4 from other pursuits and not letting slip the right moments for
doing the work well, and that yet we are in doubt whether the right
accomplishment of the business of war is not of supreme moment? Is it so
easy
5 that a man who is cultivating the soil will be at
the same time a soldier and one who is practising cobbling or any other
trade, though no man in the world could make himself a competent expert at
draughts or the dice who did not practise that and nothing else from
childhood
6 but
treated it as an occasional business? And are we to believe that a man who
[
374d]
takes in hand a shield or any other
instrument of war springs up on that very day a competent combatant in heavy
armor or in any other form of warfare—though no other tool will
make a man be an artist or an athlete by his taking it in hand, nor will it
be of any service to those who have neither acquired the science
7 of it nor sufficiently practised
themselves in its use?” “Great indeed,” he
said, “would be the value of tools in that case.
8“
“Then,” said I, “in the same degree that the
task of our guardians
9 is the greatest of all,
[
374e]
it would require more leisure than any other business
and the greatest science and training.” “I think
so,” said he. “Does it not also require a nature adapted
to that very pursuit?” “Of course.”
“It becomes our task, then, it seems, if we are able, to select
which and what kind of natures are suited for the guardianship of a
state.” “Yes, ours.” “Upon my
word,” said I, “it is no light task that we have taken
upon ourselves. But we must not faint