This text is part of:
Search the Perseus Catalog for:
View text chunked by:
[29]
If you refuse to take the oath yourself, you
may argue that the oath is only taken with a view to money; that, if you had
been a scoundrel, you would have taken it at once, for it is better to be a
scoundrel for something than for nothing; that, if you take it, you will win
your case, if not, you will probably lose it; consequently, your refusal to take
it is due to moral excellence, not to fear of committing perjury. And the
apophthegm of Xenophanes1 is apposite— that “it is unfair
for an impious man to challenge a pious one,” for it is the same as a strong man challenging a weak one to hit or be hit.
for an impious man to challenge a pious one,” for it is the same as a strong man challenging a weak one to hit or be hit.
1 Born at Colophon in Asia Minor, he migrated to Elea in Italy, where he founded the Eleatic school of philosophy.
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 United States License.
An XML version of this text is available for download, with the additional restriction that you offer Perseus any modifications you make. Perseus provides credit for all accepted changes, storing new additions in a versioning system.