This text is part of:
Search the Perseus Catalog for:
View text chunked by:
[3]
And as Homer often, by making use of
metaphor, speaks of inanimate things as if they were animate; and it is to
creating actuality in all such cases that his popularity is due, as in the
following examples: “
Again the ruthless stone rolled down to the plain.1
” “ The arrow flew.2
” “ [The arrow] eager to fly [towards the crowd].3
”
“ [The spears] were buried in the ground, longing to take their fill of flesh.4
” “ The spear-point sped eagerly through his breast.5
”. For in all these examples there is appearance of actuality, since the objects are represented as animate: “the shameless stone,” “the eager spear-point,” and the rest express actuality. Homer has attached these attributes by the employment of the proportional metaphor; for as the stone is to Sisyphus, so is the shameless one to the one who is shamelessly treated.
” “ The arrow flew.2
” “ [The arrow] eager to fly [towards the crowd].3
”
“ [The spears] were buried in the ground, longing to take their fill of flesh.4
” “ The spear-point sped eagerly through his breast.5
”. For in all these examples there is appearance of actuality, since the objects are represented as animate: “the shameless stone,” “the eager spear-point,” and the rest express actuality. Homer has attached these attributes by the employment of the proportional metaphor; for as the stone is to Sisyphus, so is the shameless one to the one who is shamelessly treated.
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 United States License.
An XML version of this text is available for download, with the additional restriction that you offer Perseus any modifications you make. Perseus provides credit for all accepted changes, storing new additions in a versioning system.