[267] It signifies little whether we put a note of interrogation after ‘exstruis,’ as most editors have done, or, as Wund. prefers, one of exclamation. In either case ‘oblite’ had better be connected with the preceding sentence, being in effect equivalent to ‘oblitus’ (comp. 2. 283 note), instead of constituting a kind of interjectional sentence by itself. The first reading of Pal. was ‘ignare,’ perhaps, as Ribbeck hints, from 3. 382.
This text is part of:
John Conington. P. Vergili Maronis opera. P. Vergili Maronis Opera. The works of Virgil, with a Commentary by John Conington, M.A. Late Corpus Professor of Latin in the University of Oxford. London. Whittaker and Co., Ave Maria Lane. 1876.
The National Endowment for the Humanities provided support for entering this text.
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 United States License.
An XML version of this text is available for download, with the additional restriction that you offer Perseus any modifications you make. Perseus provides credit for all accepted changes, storing new additions in a versioning system.